All categories

2 years ago

Which is the destructive interference formula for diffraction grating problems? dsin = dcos = dcos = n dsin = n.

1 answer:

5 0

The destructive interference formula for diffraction grating problems is $d sin \theta = (n+\frac{1}{2})\lambda$ .

<h3>What is the definition of destructive interference?</h3>

Destructive interference happens when the maxima of two waves are 180° out of phase a positive displacement of one wave is canceled exactly by a negative displacement of the other wave.

The formula for brighter patches resulting from constructive interference and darker patches resulting from destructive interference in a diffraction grating is:

$\rm d sin \theta = n \lambda$

The grating spacing is denoted by d, the angle of light is denoted by a the fringe order is denoted by n, and the wavelength is denoted by $\rm \lambda$ .

The destructive interference formula is now based on the fact that destructive interference occurs between the fringes.

Hence the destructive interference formula for diffraction grating problems is $d sin \theta = (n+\frac{1}{2})\lambda$ .

To learn more about destructive interference refer to the link;

brainly.com/question/16098226

You might be interested in

Do sound waves always travel in straight lines explain

babunello [35]

They travel like waves. Just throw rock at lake you will see wave. When it bumps to barrier barrier reflects some part of it . Not like a line lika a wave

3 0

3 years ago

Explain why stellar parallax cannot be used to measure the distance to other galaxies.

Phoenix [80]

Answer:

1. a) Astronomers use the parallax method to measure the distance to nearby stars, but

we can’t use it to measure the distance to stars in other galaxies. Why not? Why isn’t the

parallax method useful for measuring the distances to stars in other galaxies?

They are so distant that the parallax is too small to be measured since parallax varies

inversely with distance.

b) Instead of the parallax method, we use the standard candle method to measure the

distance to stars in other galaxies. In particular, we use the standard candle method to

measure the distances to Cepheid variable stars in other galaxies. What is special about

Cepheid variable stars that makes them useful for this purpose?

We can figure out their luminosities from their periods of variation. Then if we measure

their fluxes we can calculate their distances.

2. a) From what were the protons and electrons in your body made, and roughly when

were they made?

They were made from energy (or gamma rays) very soon after the big bang (in the first

second). 400,000 years later they got together to make hydrogen atoms.

b) From what were the carbon atoms in your body made, and where were they made?

They were not made in the big bang. They were made much later inside of stars or in

supernovae. They were made by fusion from lighter atoms.

3. Make two sketches of the Milky Way Galaxy, one an edge-on view and one a face-on

view, labeling the various parts of the galaxy.

You should have labeled the

8 0

3 years ago

The acceleration of a particle is given by ax(t) = -(2.00 m/s2) + (2.70 m/s3)t. (a) find the initial velocity v0x, such that the

Alexeev081 [22]

I’ll solve them right now just wait a few

3 0

3 years ago

An electromagnetic flowmeter is useful when it is desirable not to interrupt the system in which the fluid is flowing (e.g. for

AURORKA [14]

Answer:

Explanation:

The electromagnetic flow-metre work on the principle of electromagnetic induction. The induced voltage is given as

$E = Blv$

where $E$ is the induced voltage = 2.88 mV = 2.88 x 10^-3 V

$l$ is the distance between the electrodes in this field which is equivalent to the diameter of the tube = 1.2 cm = 1.2 x 10^-2 m

$v$ is the velocity of the fluid through the field = ?

$B$ is the magnetic field = 0.120 T

substituting, we have

2.88 x 10^-3 = 0.120 x 1.2 x 10^-2 x $v$

2.88 x 10^-3 = 1.44 x 10^-3 x $v$

$v$ = 2.88/1.44 = <em>2 m/s</em>

8 0

3 years ago

What quantity does the Hamiltonian correspond to? Rest mass Potential energy Total energy Kinetic energy Bohr frequency Lagrangi

PSYCHO15rus [73]

Answer:

The correct option is: Total energy

Explanation:

The Hamiltonian operator, in quantum mechanics, is an operator that is associated with the<u> total energy of the system.</u> It is equal to the sum of the total kinetic energy and the potential energy of all the particles of the system.

The Hamiltonian operator was named after the Irish mathematician, William Rowan Hamiltonis denoted and is denoted by H.

3 0

3 years ago