All categories

2 years ago

Calculate the acceleration of a 2000kg single engine airlane just before take off when the thrust of the engine is 500n?

Engineering

1 answer:

pshichka [43]2 years ago

4 0

Answer:

0.25 m/s²

Explanation:

You might be interested in

An angle grinder is best suited for use with which material?.

Kaylis [27]

Answer:

Angle grinders are used mostly for copper, iron, steel, lead, and other metals.

Explanation:

I hope it helps! Have a great day!

Lilac~

4 0

2 years ago

Describe a project in which you would use a pleater, ruffling foot, or gathering foot. Explain each of these tools and choose th

WITCHER [35]

A project that requires using a pleater, a ruffling foot, or a gathering foot is the creation of a dress.

A pleater, a ruffling foot, and a gathering foot are all accessories for sewing machines or machines themselves that help fashion designers to give the fabric a different shape or texture, and therefore create unique pieces.

Pleater: This tool includes multiple needles that go through the fabric to create multiple pleats
Ruffling foot: This is usually an accessory for sewing machines to create ruffles
Gathering foot: This tool is used to create gathers in fabric, these differ from ruffles because they are smaller and more subtle than ruffles

All of the tools can be used in the creation of a dress, for example, a pleater can be used in the top section of the dress to give it a nice texture and make it different from the skirt. In the same way, others such as the ruffling foot or the gathering foot can be used in the sleeves of the dress.

Learn more in: brainly.com/question/24702927

8 0

3 years ago

A wood pole with a diameter of 10 in. has a moisture content of 5%. The fiber saturation point (FSP) for this wood is 30%. The w

Mekhanik [1.2K]

Answer:

a) Δd(change in wood diameter) = 5%

b) The wood would swell since the moisture content is increasing which will also led to increase in the wood's diameter

C) new diameter (D2) = 10.5 in

Explanation:

Wood pole diameter = 10 inches

moisture content = 5%

FSP = 30%

A) The percentage change in the wood's diameter

note : moisture fluctuations from 5% to 30% causes dimensional changes in the wood but above 30% up to 55% causes no change. hence this formula can be used to calculate percentage change in the wood's diameter

Δd/d = 1/5(30 - 5)

Δd/d = 5%

Δd = 5%

B) would the wood swell or shrink

The wood would swell since the moisture content is increasing which will also led to increase in the wood's diameter

C) The new diameter of the wood

D2 = D + D( $\frac{M1}{100}$ )

D = initial diameter= 10 in , M1 = initial moisture content = 5%

therefore D2 = 10 + 10( 5/100 )

new diameter (D2) = 10.5 in

5 0

3 years ago

Assume a program requires the execution of 50 x 106 FP instructions, 110 x 106 INT instructions, 80 x 106 L/S instructions, and

Pavlova-9 [17]

Answer:

Part A:

$1.3568*10^{-5}=\frac{5300* New\ CPI_1+11660*1+8480*4+1696*2}{2*10^9\ Hz} \\ New\ CPI_1=-4.12$

CPI cannot be negative so it is not possible to for program to run two times faster.

Part B:

$1.3568*10^{-5}=\frac{5300*1+11660*1+8480*New\ CPI_3+1696*2}{2*10^9\ Hz} \\ New\ CPI_3=0.8$

CPI reduced by $1-\frac{0.8}{4} = 0.80$ =80%

Part C:

New Execution Time= $\frac{5300*0.6+11660*0.6+8480*2.8+1696*1.4}{2*10^9\ Hz}=1.81472*10^{-5}\ s$

Increase in speed= $1-\frac{1.81472*10^{-5}}{2.7136*10^{-5}} =0.33125= 33.125\%$

Explanation:

FP Instructions=50*106=5300

INT Instructions=110*106=11660

L/S Instructions=80*106=8480

Branch Instructions=16*106=1696

Calculating Execution Time:

Execution Time= $\frac{\sum^4_{i=1} Number\ of\ Instruction*\ CPI_{i}}{Clock\ Rate}$

Execution Time= $\frac{5300*1+11660*1+8480*4+1696*2}{2*10^9\ Hz}$

Execution Time= $2.7136*10^{-5}\ s$

Part A:

For Program to run two times faster,Execution Time (Calculated above) is reduced to half.

New Execution Time= $\frac{2.7136*10^{-5}}{2}=1.3568*10^{-5}\ s$

$1.3568*10^{-5}=\frac{5300* New\ CPI_1+11660*1+8480*4+1696*2}{2*10^9\ Hz} \\ New\ CPI_1=-4.12$

CPI cannot be negative so it is not possible to for program to run two times faster.

Part B:

For Program to run two times faster,Execution Time (Calculated above) is reduced to half.

New Execution Time= $\frac{2.7136*10^{-5}}{2}=1.3568*10^{-5}\ s$

$1.3568*10^{-5}=\frac{5300*1+11660*1+8480*New\ CPI_3+1696*2}{2*10^9\ Hz} \\ New\ CPI_3=0.8$

CPI reduced by $1-\frac{0.8}{4} = 0.80$ =80%

Part C:

$New\ CPI_1=0.6*Old\ CPI_1=0.6*1=0.6\\New\ CPI_2=0.6*Old\ CPI_2=0.6*1=0.6\\New\ CPI_3=0.7*Old\ CPI_3=0.7*4=2.8\\New\ CPI_4=0.7*Old\ CPI_4=0.7*2=1.4$

New Execution Time= $\frac{\sum^4_{i=1} Number\ of\ Instruction*\ CPI_{i}}{Clock\ Rate}$

New Execution Time= $\frac{5300*0.6+11660*0.6+8480*2.8+1696*1.4}{2*10^9\ Hz}=1.81472*10^{-5}\ s$

Increase in speed= $1-\frac{1.81472*10^{-5}}{2.7136*10^{-5}} =0.33125= 33.125\%$

8 0

3 years ago

Applying the Entropy Balance: Closed Systems Five kg of carbon dioxide (CO2) gas undergoes a process in a well-insulated piston–

Mrrafil [7]

Answer:

a) the amount of energy produced in kJ/K is 0.73145 kJ/K

b) the amount of energy produced in kJ/K is 0.68975 kJ/K

The value for entropy production obtained using constant specific heats is approximately 6% higher than the value obtained when accounting explicitly for the variation in specific heats.

Explanation:

Draw the T-s diagram.

$C_p$ = 0.939 kJ/kg.K , m = 5 kg , T₂ = 520 K , T₁ = 280

R = [8.314 kJ / 44.01 kg.K] , P₂ = 20 bar , P₁ = 2 bar

Δs = $m[c_p ln(\frac{T_2}{T_1}) - Rln(\frac{P_2}{P_1})]$

Substitute all parameters in the equation

Δs = $5[(0.939) ln(\frac{520}{280}) - (\frac{8.314}{44.01})ln(\frac{20}{2})]$

Δs = 5 kg × 0.14629 kJ/kg.K

= 0.73145 kJ/K

Δs = $m[\frac{s^0(T_2) - s^0(T_1)}{M} - Rln(\frac{P_2}{P_1})]$

Where T₁ = 280 K , s°(T₁) = 211.376 kJ/kmol.K

T₂ = 520 K , s°(T₂) = 236.575 kJ/kmol.K

R = [8.314 kJ / 44.01 kg.K] , M = 44.01 kg.K , P₂ = 20 bar , P₁ = 2 bar

Δs = $5[\frac{236.575 - 211.376}{44.01} - (\frac{8.314}{44.01})ln(\frac{20}{2})]$

= 5 kg (0.13795 kJ/kg.K)

= 0.68975 kJ/K

The value for entropy production obtained using constant specific heats is approximately 6% higher than the value obtained when accounting explicitly for the variation in specific heats.

7 0

3 years ago