1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
djverab [1.8K]
2 years ago
11

Why will a struck tuning fork sound louder when it is held against a table?.

Physics
1 answer:
QveST [7]2 years ago
7 0

Answer:
1.)the surface of the table is set into vibration
2.)the initial vibration was larger
3.)The entire table vibrates

Explanation:<u><em>hope this helps :3 have a good day xlXCherryColaXlx..(pls mark me brainliest)</em></u>

You might be interested in
a large mass m1=5.75 kg and is attached to a smaller mass m2=3.53 kg by a string. The string is hung over a pulley as shown in t
svet-max [94.6K]

The speed of the second mass after it has moved ℎ=2.47 meters will be 1.09 m/s approximately

<h3>What are we to consider in equilibrium ?</h3>

Whenever the friction in the pulley is negligible, the two blocks will accelerate at the same magnitude. Also, the tension at both sides will be the same.

Given that a large mass m1=5.75 kg and is attached to a smaller mass m2=3.53 kg by a string and the mass of the pulley and string are negligible compared to the other two masses. Mass 1 is started with an initial downward speed of 2.13 m/s.

The acceleration at which they will both move will be;

a = (m_{1} - m_{2}) / (m_{1} + m_{2})

a = (5.75 - 3.53) / (5.75 + 3.53)

a = 2.22 / 9.28

a = 0.24 m/s²

Let us assume that the second mass starts from rest, and the distance covered is the h = 2.47 m

We can use third equation of motion to calculate the speed of mass 2 after it has moved ℎ=2.47 meters.

v² = u² + 2as

since u =0

v² = 2 × 0.24 × 2.47

v² = 1.1856

v = √1.19

v = 1.0888 m/s

Therefore, the speed of mass 2 after it has moved ℎ=2.47 meters will be 1.09 m/s approximately

Learn more about Equilibrium here: brainly.com/question/517289

#SPJ1

5 0
2 years ago
I am trying to find the magnitude of a resultant vector. Do i take inconsideration the negatives when i find the x &amp; y compo
attashe74 [19]
Absolutely !  If you have two vectors with equal magnitudes and opposite
directions, then one of them is the negative of the other.  Their correct
vector sum is zero, and that's exactly the magnitude of the resultant vector.

(Think of fifty football players pulling on each end of the rope in a tug-of-war. 
Their forces are equal in magnitude but opposite in sign, and the flag that
hangs from the middle of the rope goes nowhere, because the resultant
force on it is zero.)

This gross, messy explanation is completely applicable when you're totaling up
the x-components or the y-components.
4 0
4 years ago
Tina and her puppy are tugging on a rope, each pulling on opposite ends.
anyanavicka [17]
Work is done when the ‘object moves in the same direction as the force’ an example being a man walking up a flight of stairs carrying a box of weight.

Work is not done when the direction of the applied force and the direction in which the object moves are PERPENDICULAR to each other. An example being A man carrying a load while walking, no work is done on the load in the upward direction as the load is only moving horizontally.

Thus the answer is whenever she pulls the puppy towards her

3 0
3 years ago
What is the correct formula for finding the frequency of an electromagnetic wave
Licemer1 [7]
Answer:
f = c / λ

Explanation:
Electromagnetic waves are types of periodic waves. They propagate with the same speed as light (3 * 10⁸ m/sec).
Therefore:
velocity of wave = c

Now, the equation that relates speed of wave and its frequency is as follows:
c = λf
where:
c is the speed of wave
f is the frequency of the wave
λ is the wavelength of the wave

Solve the above equation for frequency, we will end up with:
f = c / λ


3 0
3 years ago
What part of Rutherford's investigations demonstrated that the Thomson model was not accurate?
Sidana [21]
D. They showed that the atoms have a dense nucleus. Rutherford put Thomson's <span>hypothesis to test by devising a "gold foil" experiment, he figured that if Thomson's model was correct then the mass of the atom was spread out throughout the atom. If he shot high velocity alpha particles (helium nuclei) at an atom there would be very little to deflect the alpha particles. He tested this with a thin film of gold atoms, finding that most alpha particles went directly through the gold foil but, a few alpha particles rebounded backwards, which was</span><span> not consistent with Thomson's model. He was forced to discard this model and reasoned that the only way the alpha particles could be deflected backwards was if most of the mass in an atom was concentrated in a nucleus.</span>
7 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • Students repeat the experiment but replace block X and block Y with block W and block Z , as shown in Figure 3. Block W and bloc
    11·1 answer
  • PLZZ HELP AND ANSWER AND THE FIRST ONE THAT THOSE THAT WILL BE MARKED BRAINIEST!
    10·2 answers
  • Which set of magnets correctly illustrates the attraction of unlike poles?
    9·1 answer
  • 20 pts. What type of forces do not change the motion of an object? Acceleration forces Balanced forces Inertia forces Unbalanced
    15·1 answer
  • What does earths system include
    15·1 answer
  • c) If the ice block (no penguins) is pressed down even with the surface and then released, it will bounce up and down, until fri
    10·1 answer
  • What is a model pls write in ur own words
    6·1 answer
  • Please help
    6·1 answer
  • The figure shows three displacement vectors, which are labeled a, b, and c What is the magnitude and direction of the resultant
    12·1 answer
  • Compare positive reinforcement and negative reinforcement.
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!