<span>The rate of crystallizing is equivalent to the rate of dissolving.</span>
It wouldn’t, it must be at least 96% close to what Thomson did to make the Conclusion valid, it must be repeated the same and tested by another person at least 3 times. Hope this helps, mate! :)
Saturated hydrocarbons consists of C-C single bond whereas Unsaturated hydrocarbons consists C-C double/triple bond.
The isotope is identified as 58 Fe²⁺, where 58 is the mass number of the isotope.
Explanation:
In this problem, there is difference in the number of protons and electrons, but the electron number should not vary in a stable isotope. As isotopes are meant to have difference in number of neutrons leading to change in the mass number. So this means, in the present case the isotope is in oxidized state as the number of electrons is less than the number of protons. This indicates that the isotope is in +2 oxidation state, since the difference in the number of protons and electrons is 2.
Then as an isotope will be formed by varying in the number of neutrons for the elements in periodic table. So from the number of protons we can confirm the atomic number of the element. As the atomic number is given as number of protons in case of oxidized element, the atomic number of 26 in the present case will be related to Fe element in the periodic table.
Hence the isotope will be Fe in +2 oxidation state and having the atomic number as 26 and mass number as 26+32 = 58. So there is a change in the mass number of the isotope of Fe from 56 to 58.
Thus, the isotope is identified as 58 Fe²⁺, where 58 is the mass number of the isotope.
A molecular formula tells us the atoms involved in bond, what kind of atoms are involved and the ordinality of the atoms. This tells the number of atoms found in the molecule. This can be used to derive the stoichiometric ratios of different atoms. The answer to this problem is a. True.
