All categories

3 years ago

Example: What power of spectacle lens is needed to correct the vision of a nearsighted person

Physics

1 answer:

Aleksandr [31]3 years ago

4 0

<h3>Concave or diverging lens is needed correct the vision of a nearsighted person whose far point is 30.0 cm</h3>

<em><u>Solution:</u></em>

Nearsighted person will not be able to see the distant objects clearly

Now, we want the near sighted person to see the distant objects clearly

<em><u>The lens equation is given as:</u></em>

$P = \frac{1}{d_o} + \frac{1}{d_i}$

For distant vision, $d_0 = \infty$

$d_i = image\ distance\\\\d_0 = lens\ to\ retina\ distance$

The image of 30 cm from eye will be 28.5 cm to left of spectacle lens

Therefore,

$d_i = -28.5\ cm = 0.285\ meter$

From lens equation,

$P = \frac{1}{ \infty } + \frac{1}{-0.285\ meter}\\\\P = 0 - 3.51 \\\\P = -3.51\ diopter$

The negative power -3.51 D denotes that a concave or diverging lens is needed

You might be interested in

What do the movements of stars and galaxies tell astronomers about how the universe formed?

natulia [17]

This could be Hubble's law, or something related to it. I think there's a possibly Doppler RED SHIFT in the optical spectra of stars etc as observed on the earth. It seems that they are accelerating away from the earth, and that the further away they are the faster they are moving.
It seems that this has been connected to the idea of "The Big Bang" theory of the origin of the universe which seems to have superceded Professor Sir Fred Hoye's Steady State theory of the universe.
There's some Special Relativity in this lot, too.

3 0

2 years ago

Even when the head is held erect, as in the figure below, its center of mass is not directly over the principal point of support

alexandr1967 [171]

We are asked to determine the force required by the neck muscle in order to keep the head in equilibrium. To do that we will add the torques produced by the muscle force and the weight of the head. We will use torque in the clockwise direction to be negative, therefore, we have:

$\Sigma T=r_{M\perp}(F_M)-r_{W\perp}(W)$

Since we want to determine the forces when the system is at equilibrium this means that the total sum of torque is zero:

$r_{M\perp}(F_M)-r_{W\perp}(W)=0$

Now, we solve for the force of the muscle. First, we add the torque of the weight to both sides:

$r_{M\perp}(F_M)=r_{W\perp}(W)$

Now, we divide by the distance of the muscle:

$(F_M)=\frac{r_{W\perp}(W)}{r_{M\perp}}$

Now, we substitute the values:

$F_M=\frac{(2.4cm)(50N)}{5.1cm}$

Now, we solve the operations:

$F_M=23.53N$

Therefore, the force exerted by the muscles is 23.53 Newtons.

Part B. To determine the force on the pivot we will add the forces we add the vertical forces:

$\Sigma F_v=F_j-F_M-W$

Since there is no vertical movement the sum of vertical forces is zero:

$F_j-F_M-W=0$

Now, we add the force of the muscle and the weight to both sides to solve for the force on the pivot:

$F_j=F_M+W$

Now, we plug in the values:

$F_j=23.53N+50N$

Solving the operations:

$F_j=73.53N$

Therefore, the force is 73.53 Newtons.

8 0

7 months ago

When a carpenter shuts off his circular saw, the 10.0 inch diameter blade slows from 4250 rpm to 0.00 in 4.00 s. (a) What is the

MaRussiya [10]

Answer:

(a) $\alpha=-111.26rad/s$

(b) $s=4450.6in$

Explanation:

First change the units of the velocity, using these equivalents $1rev=2\pi rad$ and $1 min =60s$

$4250rpm(\frac{2\pi rad}{1rev})(\frac{1 min}{60 s} )=445.06rad/s$

The angular acceleration $\alpha$ the time rate of change of the angular speed $\omega$ according to:

$\alpha=\frac{\Delta \omega}{\Delta t}$

$\Delta \omega=\omega_i-\omega_f$

Where $\omega_i$ is the original velocity, in the case the velocity before starting the deceleration, and $\omega_f$ is the final velocity, equal to zero because it has stopped.

$\alpha=\frac{\Delta \omega}{\Delta t} =\frac{\omega_i-\omega_f}{4}\frac{0-445.06}{4} =\frac{-445.06}{4} =-111.26rad/s$

b) To find the distance traveled in radians use the formula:

$\theta = \omega_i t + \frac{1}{2} \alpha t^2$

$\theta = 445.06 (4) + \frac{1}{2}(-111.26) (4)^2=1780.24-890.12=890.12rad$

To change this result to inches, solve the angular displacement $\theta$ for the distance traveled $s$ ( $r$ is the radius).

$\theta=\frac{s}{r} \\s=\theta r$

$s=890.12(5)=4450.6in$

c) The displacement is the difference between the original position and the final. But in every complete rotation of the rim, the point returns to its original position. so is needed to know how many rotations did the point in the 890.16 rad of distant traveled:

$\frac{890.12}{2\pi}=141.6667$

The real difference is in the 0.6667 (or 2/3) of the rotation. To find the distance between these positions imagine a triangle formed with the center of the blade (point C), the initial position (point A) and the final position (point B). The angle $\gamma=\frac{2\pi}{3}=\frac{360^o}{3}=120$ is between the two sides known. Using the theorem of the cosine we can find the missing side of the the triangle(which is also the net displacement):