1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Naddik [55]
3 years ago
10

A boy throws a rock with an initial velocity of 2.15 m/s at 30.0° above the horizontal. If air resistance is negligible, how lon

g does it take for the rock to reach the maximum height of its trajectory?
Physics
1 answer:
vladimir1956 [14]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

t = 0.11 second

The time taken to reach the maximum height of the trajectory is 0.11 second

Explanation:

Taking the vertical component of the initial velocity;

Vy = Vsin∅

Initial velocity V = 2.15 m/s

Angle ∅ = 30°

Vy = 2.15sin30 = 2.15 × 0.5

Vy = 1.075 m/s

The height of the rock at time t during the flight is;

From the equation of motion;

h(t) = Vy×t - 0.5gt^2

g= acceleration due to gravity = 9.8m/s^2

Substituting the given values;

h(t) = 1.075t - 0.5(9.8)t^2

h(t) = 1.075t - 4.9t^2

The rock is at maximum height when dh/dt = 0;

dh(t)/dt = 1.075 - 9.8t = 0

1.075 - 9.8t = 0

9.8t = 1.075

t = 1.075/9.8

t = 0.109693877551 s

t = 0.11 second

The time taken to reach the maximum height of the trajectory is 0.11 second

You might be interested in
Your own car has a mass of 2000 kg. If your car produces a force of 5000 N, how fast will it accelerate?
Sidana [21]

Answer:

2.5m/s²

Explanation:

Given parameters:

Mass of car  = 2000kg

Force produced by the car  = 5000N

Unknown:

Acceleration of the car  = ?

Solution:

According to Newton's second law of motion, Force is a product of mass and acceleration.

  Force  = mass x acceleration

Now, insert the parameters and find the unknown;

  5000 = 2000 x acceleration

   Acceleration  = \frac{5000}{2000}   = 2.5m/s²

7 0
3 years ago
Question points)
Marysya12 [62]

At number 5 (choice E).

6 0
3 years ago
A quarterback back pedals 3.3 meters southward and then runs 5.7 meters northward. For this motion, what is the distance moved?
mixas84 [53]

Answer:

The distance moved is 9 meters

The magnitude of the displacement is 2.4 meters

The direction of the displacement is northward

Explanation:

- <em><u>Distance</u></em> is the length of the actual path between the initial and the

  final position. Distance is a scalar quantity

- <u><em>Displacement</em></u> is the change in position, measuring from its starting

  position to the final position. Displacement is a vector quantity

The quarterback pedals 3.3 meters southward

That means it moves down 3.3 meters

Then runs 5.7 meters northward

That means it runs up 5.7 meters

The distance = 3.3 + 5.7 = 9 meters

<em></em>

<em>The distance moved is 9 meters</em>

It moves southward (down) for 3.3 meters and then moves northward

(up) for 5.7

It moves from zero to 3.3 down and then moves up to 5.7

The displacement = 5.7 - 3.3 = 2.4 meters northward

<em />

<em>The magnitude of the displacement is 2.4 meters</em>

<em>The direction of the displacement is northward</em>

8 0
3 years ago
The viewing screen in a double-slit experiment with monochromatic light. Fringe C is the central maximum. The fringe separation
makvit [3.9K]

Answer:

<em>Part A</em><em>:</em>

a) If the wavelength of the light is decreased the fringe spacing Δy will decrease.

<em>Part B</em><em>:</em>

b) If the spacing between the slits is decreased the fringe spacing Δy will increase.

<em>Part C</em><em>:</em>

a) If the distance to the screen is decreased the fringe spacing will decrease.

<em>Part D</em><em>:</em>

The dot in the center of fringe E is 920\ x\ 10^{-9} m farther from the left slit than from the right slit.

Explanation:

In the double-slit experiment there is a clear contrast between the dark and bright fringes, that indicate destructive and constructive interference respectively, in the central peak and then is less so at either side.

The position of bright fringes in the screen where the pattern is formed can be calculated with

                      \vartriangle y =\frac{m \lambda L}{d}

                      m=0,\pm 1,\pm 2,\pm 3,.....

  1. m is the order number.
  2. \lambda is the wavelength of the monochromatic light.
  3. L is the distance between the screen and the two slits.
  4. d is the distance between the slits.
  • Part A:  a) In the above equation for the position of bright fringes we can see that if the wavelength of the light \lambda is decreased the overall effect will be that the fringes are going to be closer. That means that the fringe spacing Δy will decrease.
  • Part B:  b) In the above equation for the position of bright fringes we can see that if the spacing between the slits d is decreased the fringes are going to be wider apart. That means the fringe spacing Δy will increase.
  • Part C:  a) In the above equation we can see that if the distance to the screen L is decreased the fringes are going to be closer. That means the fringe spacing Δy will decrease.
  • Part D: We are told that the central maximum is the fringe C that corresponds with m=0. That means that fringe E corresponds with the order number m=2 if we consider it to be the second maximum at the rigth of the central one. To calculate how much farther from the left slit than from the right slit is a dot located at  the center of the fringe E in the screen we use the condition for constructive interference. That says that the  path length difference Δr between rays coming from the left and right slit must be \vartriangle r=m \lambda

        We simply replace the values in that equation :

                      \vartriangle r= m \lambda =2.\ 460\ nm

                      \vartriangle r= 920\ x\ 10^{-9} m

         The dot in the center of fringe E is 920\ x\ 10^{-9}m farther from the left slit than from the right slit.

     

       

       

     

3 0
3 years ago
The mass of a moving object increases, but its speed stays the same. What happens to the kinetic energy of the object as a resul
Ronch [10]
We Know, K.E. = 1/2 × m × v²
From the expression, we can conclude that Kinetic energy is directly proportional to mass. So, as mass will increase, Kinetic energy will also increase.

In short, Your Correct answer would be Option B

Hope this helps!
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • How does melting And burning sugar follow the law of conservation of mass
    8·2 answers
  • Why does the percentage of water vapor vary?
    10·1 answer
  • How long does creatine phosphate provide every
    9·1 answer
  • This problem has been solved! See the answer A proton with a speed of 3.5x10^6 m/s is shot into a region between two plates that
    12·1 answer
  • Why does Mercury have so little gas in its atmosphere? Choose one or more: A. Its escape velocity is low. B. It has a high tempe
    7·1 answer
  • Two infinitely long parallel wires carry current in opposite directions. Wire 1 has current 15.0 A and wire 2 has current 19.9 A
    7·1 answer
  • Sarah weighs 392 N. She pushes a 56 kg rock with a force of 65 N. What force does the rock exert on Sarah?
    6·1 answer
  • Kara is pushing a shopping cart to the right. The gravitational force is acting ________.
    7·1 answer
  • Which of the following is 8000 written in scientific notation?
    12·1 answer
  • 10. Unless a light ray comes into contact with a surface or enters a different material, it
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!