Ask question

Ask question

All categories

3 years ago

15

A student hypothesizes that since elements in the same row have the same number of energy levels, they should behave the same in

chemical reactions. Explain why you agree or disagree with this hypothesis.

1 answer:

Lelechka [254]3 years ago

3 0

Disagree.

Because the elements in the same row have different number of electrons in the external shell and the electrons in the external shells are the ones that participate iin the chemial reactions; then different number of electrons in external shells predict diferent behavior in chemical reactions.

You might be interested in

What evidence supports the conclusion that a chemical reaction has occurred?

GalinKa [24]

Answer:

Precipitation formed

Temperature change

fizzing and hissing

bubbles

change in state

Explanation:

3 0

2 years ago

What is the velocity of a car that travels -50 meters in 5 seconds then 10 meters in 5 seconds

diamong [38]

Answer:

2 m/s

Explanation:

The first part of the question the car is going in reverse or negative along the x axis. Then the second part the car is moving forward along the x axis. So the car would only have velocity in the current direction of movement. So our equation for velocity is as follows.

v = d/t

v = 10 m/5 s

v = 2 m/s

3 0

3 years ago

. Consider the equation =0+0+02/2+03/6+04/24+5/120, where s is a length and t is a time. What are the dimensions and SI units of

Olegator [25]

Answer:

See Explanation

Explanation:

Given

$s=s_0+v_0t+\frac{a_0t^2}{2}+ \frac{j_0t^3}{6}+\frac{S_0t^4}{24}+\frac{ct^5}{120}$

Solving (a): Units and dimension of $s_0$

From the question, we understand that:

$s \to L$ --- length

$t \to T$ --- time

Remove the other terms of the equation, we have:

$s=s_0$

Rewrite as:

$s_0=s$

This implies that $s_0$ has the same unit and dimension as $s$

Hence:

$s_0 \to L$ --- dimension

$s_o \to$ Length (meters, kilometers, etc.)

Solving (b): Units and dimension of $v_0$

Remove the other terms of the equation, we have:

$s=v_0t$

Rewrite as:

$v_0t = s$

Make $v_0$ the subject

$v_0 = \frac{s}{t}$

Replace s and t with their units

$v_0 = \frac{L}{T}$

$v_0 = LT^{-1}$

Hence:

$v_0 \to LT^{-1}$ --- dimension

$v_0 \to$ $m/s$ --- unit

Solving (c): Units and dimension of $a_0$

Remove the other terms of the equation, we have:

$s=\frac{a_0t^2}{2}$

Rewrite as:

$\frac{a_0t^2}{2} = s_0$

Make $a_0$ the subject

$a_0 = \frac{2s_0}{t^2}$

Replace s and t with their units [ignore all constants]

$a_0 = \frac{L}{T^2}\\$

$a_0 = LT^{-2$

Hence:

$a_0 = LT^{-2$ --- dimension

$a_0 \to$ $m/s^2$ --- acceleration

Solving (d): Units and dimension of $j_0$

Remove the other terms of the equation, we have:

$s=\frac{j_0t^3}{6}$

Rewrite as:

$\frac{j_0t^3}{6} = s$

Make $j_0$ the subject

$j_0 = \frac{6s}{t^3}$

Replace s and t with their units [Ignore all constants]

$j_0 = \frac{L}{T^3}$

$j_0 = LT^{-3}$

Hence:

$j_0 = LT^{-3}$ --- dimension

$j_0 \to$ $m/s^3$ --- unit

Solving (e): Units and dimension of $s_0$

Remove the other terms of the equation, we have:

$s=\frac{S_0t^4}{24}$

Rewrite as:

$\frac{S_0t^4}{24} = s$

Make $S_0$ the subject

$S_0 = \frac{24s}{t^4}$

Replace s and t with their units [ignore all constants]

$S_0 = \frac{L}{T^4}$

$S_0 = LT^{-4$

Hence:

$S_0 = LT^{-4$ --- dimension

$S_0 \to$ $m/s^4$ --- unit

Solving (e): Units and dimension of $c$

Ignore other terms of the equation, we have:

$s=\frac{ct^5}{120}$

Rewrite as:

$\frac{ct^5}{120} = s$

Make $c$ the subject

$c = \frac{120s}{t^5}$

Replace s and t with their units [Ignore all constants]

$c = \frac{L}{T^5}$

$c = LT^{-5}$

Hence:

$c \to LT^{-5}$ --- dimension

$c \to m/s^5$ --- units

4 0

3 years ago

Answer the following questions

kiruha [24]

I ueueeieueueuekdududieisidudud

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

a 15-nC point charge is at the center of a thin spherical shell of radius 10cm, carrying -22nC of charge distributed uniformly o

Aleks [24]

Answer:

A) E = 278925.62 N/C with direction; radially out.

B) E = 43048.47 N/C with direction radially out.

C) E = -3214.29 N/C with direction radially in.

Explanation:

From Gauss' Law, the Electric field for any spherically symmetric charge or charge distribution is the same as the point charge formula. Thus;

E = kQ/r²

where;

Q is the net charge within the distance r.

We are given the charge Q = 15-nC and

spherical shell of radius 10cm

A) The distance r = 2.2 cm = 0.022 m is between the surface and the point charge, so only the point charge lies within this distance and Q = 15 nC = 15 x 10^(-9) C

While k is coulombs constant with a value of 9 × 10^(9) N.m²/C²

E = ((9 x 10^(9) × (15 x 10^(-9)))/(0.022)²

E = 278925.62 N/C

This will be radially out ,since the net charge is positive.

B) The distance r = 5.6 cm = 0.056 m is between the surface and the point charge, so only the point charge lies within this distance and Q = 15 nC = 15 x 10^(-9) C

While k is coulombs constant with a value of 9 × 10^(9) N.m²/C²

E = ((9 x 10^(9) × (15 x 10^(-9)))/(0.056)²

E = 43048.47 N/C

This will be radially out ,since the net charge is positive.

C) The distance r = 14 cm = 0.14 m is outside the sphere so the "net" charge within this distance is due to both given charges. Thus;

Q = 15 nC - 22 nC

Q = -7 nC = -7 x 10^(-9) C

and;

E = (9 x 10^(9)*(-7 x 10^(-9))/(0.14)²

E = -3214.29 N/C

This will be radially in, since the net charge is negative. You can indicate this with a negative answer.

8 0

3 years ago