1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
victus00 [196]
3 years ago
5

Suppose the average return on Asset A is 6.9 percent and the standard deviation is 8.1 percent and the average return and standa

rd deviation on Asset B are 4.0 percent and 3.5 percent, respectively. Further assume that the returns are normally distributed. Use the NORMDIST function in Excel to answer the following questions.
a. What is the probability that in any given year, the return on Asset A will be greater than 10 percent? Less than 0 percent? (Round your answers to 2 decimal places. (e.g., 32.16))
Greater than 10 percent %
Less than 0 percent %
b. What is the probability that in any given year, the return on Asset B will be greater than 10 percent? Less than 0 percent? (Round your answers to 2 decimal places. (e.g., 32.16))
Greater than 10 percent %
Less than 0 percent %
c-1 In 1979, the return on Asset A was -4.36 percent. How likely is it that such a low return will recur at some point in the future? (Round your answer to 2 decimal places. (e.g., 32.16))
Probability %
c-2 Asset B had a return of 10.70 percent in this same year. How likely is it that such a high return on T -bills will recur at some point in the future?(Round your answer to 2 decimal places. (e.g., 32.16)
Business
1 answer:
olasank [31]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Explanation:

Let us follow this accordingly

a. We have that ;

Z is given as = (X-mean)/standard deviation

where X = 10, mean = 6.9 and standard deviation is 8.1 ------- for A

inputting values we have;

Z = (10-6.9)/8.1 = 0.3827

Using the NORMDIST function in excel, [NORMDIST(0.3827)] = 0.649. This is the probability of earning less than 10%.

Hence the probability of earning more than 10% = 1-0.649 = 0.351 or 35.1%

b. At less than 0%;

X = 0,  mean = 6.9 and standard deviation is 8.1

Thus Z = (0-6.9)/8.1 = - 0.8519. Using the NORMDIST function in excel, [NORMDIST(-0.8519)] = 0.1971 or 19.71%.

From this, the probability of earning less than 0% = 19.71%

c. Also For B;

X = 10%, mean = 4% and standard deviation = 3.5%

inputting values gives us ;

Z = (10-4)/3.5 = 1.7143.

Using the NORMDIST function in excel, [NORMDIST(1.7143)] = 0.9568. This is the probability of earning less than 10%.

Which makes the probability of earning more than 10% = 1-0.9568 = 0.0432 i.e 4.32%

d. Als, X = 0.

Giving us;

Z = (0-4)/3.5 = -1.1429.  

Using the NORMDIST function in excel, [NORMDIST(-1.1429)] = 0.1265 or 12.65%

Thus the probability of earning less than 0% = 12.65%

e. Return on A = -4.36%

Thus z = (-4.36 - 6.9)/8.1 = -1.39. NORMDIST of -1.39 = 0.0822 or 8.22%

f. Return of B = 10.7%

Thus z = (10.7% - 4)/3.5 = 1.9143.

Its NORMDIST = 0.9722

This makes the probability of earning less than 10.7%.

Thus required probability gives us = 1-0.9722 = 2.78%

You might be interested in
Say that Alland can produce 32 units of food per person per year or 16 units of clothing per person per year, but Georgeland can
bixtya [17]

Answer:

Georgeland has an absolute but not a comparative advantage in producing clothing.

Explanation:

Absolute advantage is defined as the ability of a firm to produce higher amounts of a product as a result of use of the same resources with other competitors. It is usually bad a result of more efficient production process.

Comparative advantage is the ability of a firm to produce goods at a lower opportunity cost. Therefore they are able to sell at lower price compared to competitors.

Georgeland can produce 18 units of clothe per year while Alland can produce 16 units per year, so Georgeland has absolute advantage.

In producing clothes Georgeland has opportunity cost of 36 units of food which is higher than that of Alland which is 32 units of food. So Georgeland does not have comparative advantage in producing clothes.

3 0
3 years ago
A dealer bought some tires for 6500. the tires were sold for 9500. making 50 on each tire. how many tires were involved?
VMariaS [17]
Cost price = 6,500
Selling price + profit = 9500
Profit gained = 9,500 - 6,500 = $3000
Number of tires bought = 3000/50 = 60
The dealer bought 60 tires.

6 0
3 years ago
Akika Corporation started as a small firm and has grown substantially in the past decade. Its interests span from electronics to
lakkis [162]

Answer:

a. Unity of direction

Explanation:

Unity of direction: In this principle, the direction of work is given by the higher authority with a view to achieving the organizational objective.  

Division of work: In this principle, the work is divided between many subordinates/ employees, so that the task should be done in proper time and in an efficient & effective manner.

Scalar chain: This scalar chain represents the rank from high authority to low authority in a straight line so that proper communication/ cooperation can be done without any misunderstanding.  

Unity of command: In this principle, the employees are responsible for only one person/ one supervisor/ one commander.  

In the given scenario, the unity of direction principle applies as the board of directors wants to establish an independent business so that each domain objective can be achieved so that it becomes to accomplish the organizational objective.  

6 0
3 years ago
The variable in an experiment that is observed or measured in response to the experimental condition is known as the _________ v
Ierofanga [76]
Design make liability
5 0
3 years ago
Peterson Corporation wanted to run an ad campaign that featured popular songs sung by the original singer. The aim was to make a
belka [17]

Answer:

Misappropriation refers to the use of another person's intellectual property including their name or likeness without prior permission from the person which can then cause harm to that person.

This is indeed an example of misappropriation because the company tried to use Bette's likeness in the commercial. After being rebuffed by Bette saying that she does not do commercials for whatever business or personal reasons known to her, they still sought to use her popularity and image to make their products more popular.

To do so they hired a backup singer and told her to sing as much like Bette as she could so much so that even Bette's close acquaintances thought that it was Bette. If her close acquaintances could think it was her, imagine the general public.

They therefore made it seem as though Bette did their commercial which then would mean that Bette does in fact do commercials which would do damage her assertion that she does not do same. This would bring harm to her business relationships if for instance she had rebuffed other companies in the past when they sought her to do their commercials.

This is a case of Misappropriation and Bette should sue.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • A company's Office Supplies account shows a beginning balance of $720 and an ending balance of $640. If office supplies expense
    6·1 answer
  • Suppose the real rate is 2.5 percent and the inflation rate is 4.1 percent. what rate would you expect to see on a treasury bill
    13·1 answer
  • When private ownership rights are well-defined and enforced, ownerscan ignore the wishes of others, without bearing the cost.hav
    12·1 answer
  • Printers Company pays a $25,000 annual membership fee to a trade association for paper wholesalers. The trade association estima
    15·1 answer
  • Positively-framed marketing messages are generally more persausive than negatively-framed marketing messages.
    6·1 answer
  • For each of the following monetary policies, calculate the change in money supply.1. The Fed purchases $500 worth of bonds from
    9·1 answer
  • Which of the following would be categorized as an opportunity cost?
    6·1 answer
  • Sweeten Company had no jobs in progress at the beginning of March and no beginning inventories. The company has two manufacturin
    11·1 answer
  • Ttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt
    7·2 answers
  • People are unlikely to buy Big Macs in the places where they are relatively cheap (according to purchasing power parity) and sel
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!