All categories

3 years ago

In your opinion, is "avoiding" an effective conflict management strategy? Why or why not?

2 answers:

6 0

I don't think avoiding would be an effective conflict management strategy, because if it's something serious or even something small you shouldn't really ever avoid anything especially if it's between you and another person because it could damage something between you two for awhile or maybe forever. So no i don't think that is a good why to handle something.

soldi70 [24.7K]3 years ago

4 0

In my personal opinion, avoiding in not an effective conflict management strategy. When you are avoiding a conflict, you are really just pushing it to the side and it will need to be dealt with sooner or later. Avoiding a conflict is also ammeter thing to do as well, you should take responsibility and handle any situation.

You might be interested in

Bill Nye help.. I didn’t get link to vid, hoping y’all have seen it. 20 POINTS!

Lyrx [107]

Answer:

Potential, Kinetic and Chemical energy.

Explanation:

btw, congratulations for turning into an expert.

6 0

3 years ago

We drive at a speed of 20 km/h for 3 hours. Then we drive 4 hours at 30 km/h. Calculate our average speed.

Afina-wow [57]

First speed = 20km/h

Time = 3 hours

Distance = 3×20

Second speed = 30km/h

Time = 4 hours

Distance = 4×30

Total distance = 60+120 = <u>180km</u>

Total time = 3+4 =<u> 7 hours</u>

Average speed = 180/7

Hope this will help...

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Examine the roller coaster track above. Assume there is negligible friction as the roller coaster moves from position A to posit

anyanavicka [17]

At point E

the kinetic energy of the rollercoaster is small compared to the potential energy
the potential energy is greater than the kinetic energy
the total energy is a mixture of potential and kinetic energy

<h3>What is the energy of the roller coaster at point E?</h3>

The energy of a roller coaster could either be potential energy, kinetic energy or a combination of both potential and kinetic energy.

Using analogies, the energy of the roller coaster at point E can be compared to a falling fruit from a tree which falls onto a pavement and is the rolling towards the floor. Point E can be compared to the midpoint of the fall of the fruit.

At point E

the kinetic energy of the rollercoaster is small compared to the potential energy
the potential energy is greater than the kinetic energy
the total energy is a mixture of potential and kinetic energy

In conclusion, the energy of the rollercoaster at E is both Kinetic and potential energy,

Learn more about potential and kinetic energy at: brainly.com/question/18963960

#SPJ1

5 0

2 years ago

If the man pushes with a force of 2000N and friction is 500N, what is the resultant force?

alexandr402 [8]

Answer:

Explanation:

If the force of 2000 N is directed towards the right and the friction is directed towards the left, the 2000 N force is positive and the other is negative. To find the resultant force:

2000 - 500 = 1500 N to the right

3 0

3 years ago

How does a mirror affect the path of light?

yulyashka [42]

Light rays change direction when they hit a mirror. The phenomenon is known as reflection. Light rays travels in a straight light. They strike the surface of the mirror at a particular angle called incident angle. It is the angle between the ray and normal at the point of contact. The rays leaves the surface making the same angle with the normal called reflection angle but in different direction.

8 0

3 years ago