Answer:
The kinetic energy of a body is the energy that it possessed due to its motion. Kinetic energy can be defined as the work needed to accelerate an object of a given mass from rest to its stated velocity. Kinetic energy depends upon the velocity and the mass of the body.
Answer:
Pemain A
Explanation:
Mengingat data berikut;
Kecepatan pemain A = 12 m/s
Kecepatan pemain B = 36 km/h
Untuk menentukan siapa pelari tercepat di antara dua pemain;
Pertama-tama, kita harus mengubah kecepatan menjadi satuan standar pengukuran yang sama.
Jadi, mari kita gunakan pengukuran umum meter per detik.
Konversi:
36 km/h = (36 * 1000)/(60 * 60)
36 km/h = 36000/3600
36 km/h = 10 m/s
Kecepatan pemain B = 10 m/s
Oleh karena itu, dibandingkan dengan kecepatan pemain A; pemain A lebih cepat.
Answer: assuming that the billiard balls are of identical weight the impacted billiard ball will move forward at around 0.5m/s (not considering energy conservation). The ball impacting the 2nd one would stop because most of its Kinetic energy would have been transferred into the not moving ball.
Explanation: hope this helps!
Answer:
Explanation:
The spring is stretched by .5 m and then released that means its amplitude of oscillation A is 0.5 m .
A = 0.5 m
After the release at one extreme point , the mass comes to rest again at another extreme point after half the time period ie
T / 2 = .3 s
T = 0.6 s
Angular velocity
ω = 
ω = 
ω = 10.45
Maximum velocity = ω A
ω and A are angular velocity and amplitude of oscillation.
Maximum velocity = 10.45 x .5
= 5.23 m /s
You asked a question. I'm about to answer it.
Sadly, I can almost guarantee that you won't understand the solution.
This realization grieves me, but there is little I can do to change it.
My explanation will be the best of which I'm capable.
Here are the Physics facts I'll use in the solution:
-- "Apparent magnitude" means how bright the star appears to us.
-- "Absolute magnitude" means the how bright the star WOULD appear
if it were located 32.6 light years from us (10 parsecs).
-- A change of 5 magnitudes means a 100 times change in brightness,
so each magnitude means brightness is multiplied or divided by ⁵√100 .
That's about 2.512... .
-- Increasing magnitude means dimmer.
Decreasing magnitude means brighter.
+5 is 10 magnitudes dimmer than -5 .
-- Apparent brightness is inversely proportional to the square
of the distance from the source (just like gravity, sound, and
the force between charges).
That's all the Physics. The rest of the solution is just arithmetic.
____________________________________________________
-- The star in the question would appear M(-5) at a distance of
32.6 light years.
-- It actually appears as a M(+5). That's 10 magnitudes dimmer than M(-5),
because of being farther away than 32.6 light years.
-- 10 magnitudes dimmer is ( ⁵√100)⁻¹⁰ = (100)^(-2) .
-- But brightness varies as the inverse square of distance,
so that exponent is (negative double) the ratio of the distances,
and the actual distance to the star is
(32.6) · (100)^(1) light years
= (32.6) · (100) light years
= approx. 3,260 light years . (roughly 1,000 parsecs)
I'll have to confess that I haven't done one of these calculations
in over 50 years, and I'm not really that confident in my result.
If somebody's health or safety depended on it, or the success of
a space mission, then I'd be strongly recommending that you get
a second opinion.
But, quite frankly, I do feel that mine is worth the 5 points.
