1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Sergeu [11.5K]
3 years ago
10

Potassium is a crucial element for the healthy operation of the human body. Potassium occurs naturally in our environment and th

us our bodies) as three isotopes: Potassium-39, Potassium-40, and Potassium-41. Their current abundances are 93.26%, 0.012% and 6.728%. A typical human body contains about 3.0 grams of Potassium per kilogram of body mass. 1. How much Potassium-40 is present in a person with a mass of 80 kg? 2. If, on average, the decay of Potassium-40 results in 1.10 MeV of energy absorbed, determine the effective dose (in Sieverts) per year due to Potassium-40 in an 80- kg body. Assume an RBE of 1.2. The half-life of Potassium-40 is 1.28 x 10°years.
Physics
1 answer:
gregori [183]3 years ago
7 0

Complete Question

Potassium is a crucial element for the healthy operation of the human body. Potassium occurs naturally in our environment and thus our bodies) as three isotopes: Potassium-39, Potassium-40, and Potassium-41. Their current abundances are 93.26%, 0.012% and 6.728%. A typical human body contains about 3.0 grams of Potassium per kilogram of body mass. 1. How much Potassium-40 is present in a person with a mass of 80 kg? 2. If, on average, the decay of Potassium-40 results in 1.10 MeV of energy absorbed, determine the effective dose (in Sieverts) per year due to Potassium-40 in an 80- kg body. Assume an RBE of 1.2. The half-life of Potassium-40 is 1.28 * 10^9years.

Answer:

The potassium-40 present in 80 kg is  Z = 0.0288 *10^{-3}\ kg

The effective dose absorbed per year is  x = 2.06 *10^{-24} per year

Explanation:

From the question we are told that

      The mass of potassium in 1 kg of human body is m =  3g= \frac{3}{1000} =  3*10^{-3} \ kg

      The mass of the person is M = 80 \ kg

       The abundance of Potassium-39 is   93.26%

        The abundance of Potassium-40 is   0.012%

         The abundance of Potassium-41 is   6.78 %

         The energy absorbed is  E =  1.10MeV = 1.10 *10^{6} * 1.602 *10^{-19} = 1.7622*10^{-13} J

Now  1 kg of human body contains       3.0*10^{-3}\ kg of  Potassium

So      80 kg of human body contains      k kg of  Potassium

=>   k = \frac{ 80 * 3*10^{-3}}{1}

     k = 0.240\  kg

Now from the question potassium-40 is  0.012% of the total  potassium so

     Amount of potassium-40  present is mathematically represented as

            Z = \frac{0.012}{100}  * 0.240

            Z = 0.0288 *10^{-3}\ kg

The effective dose (in Sieverts) per year due to Potassium-40 in an 80- kg body is mathematically evaluated as

           D =  \frac{E}{M}

Substituting values

          D =  \frac{1.7622*10^{-13}}{80}

            D =  2.2*10^{-15} J/kg

Converting to Sieverts

We have

           D_s = REB * D

           D_s = 1.2 * 2.2 *10^{-15}

           D_s =  2.64 *10^{-15}

So

     for half-life (1.28 *10^9 \ years)  the dose is  2.64 *10^{-15}

     Then for 1  year the dose would be  x

=>         x = \frac{2.64 *10^{-15}}{1.28 * 10^9}

             x = 2.06 *10^{-24} per year      

You might be interested in
What is the density of an object with a mass of 60g and a volume of 2cm3?
zaharov [31]

m= 60g = 60/1000 Kg = 0.06 Kg v = 2cm3 = 2 * (0.01^3) m3 = 2 *10^-6 m3 Density= m/v = 6 * 10^-2 / 2 *10^-6  =  3 *10^4 Kg/m3

8 0
2 years ago
a projectile is lunched with an initial speed of 60.0mm/s at an angle of 30.0° above the horizontal.The projectile lands on a hi
alexandr402 [8]

Answer:

52 mm/s (approximately)

Explanation:

Given:

Initial speed of the projectile is, u=60.0\ mm/s

Angle of projection is, \theta=30.0\°

Time taken to land on the hill is, t=4\ s

In a projectile motion, there is acceleration only in the vertical direction which is equal to acceleration due to gravity acting vertically downward. There is no acceleration in the horizontal direction.

So, the velocity in the horizontal direction always remains the same.

The horizontal component of initial velocity is given as:

u_x=u\cos\theta\\u_x=60\times \cos(30)\\u_x=30\sqrt3\approx52\ mm/s

Now, the velocity in the vertical direction goes on decreasing and becomes 0 at the highest point of the trajectory. So, at the highest point, only horizontal component acts.

Therefore, the projectile's velocity at the highest point of its trajectory is equal to the horizontal component of initial velocity and thus is equal to 52 mm/s.

6 0
3 years ago
What will be the value of both charges if they are 5 cm apart and suffer a
Mrac [35]

Answer:

\boxed{q = 1.2 \times  {10}^{ - 6} C}

Explanation:

f_e =   \frac{{q}^{2}k }{ {r}^{2} }  \\ q =  \sqrt{ \frac{f_e( {r}^{2} )}{k} }  =  \sqrt{ \frac{5.2(5 \times  {10}^{ - 2} )^{2} }{9 \times  {10}^{9} } }  \\ q =\sqrt{ \frac{5.2(5 \times  {10}^{ - 2} )^{2} }{9 \times  {10}^{9} } }  =  \sqrt{ \frac{0.013}{9 \times  {10}^{9} } }  \\ q = 1.2 \times  {10}^{ - 6}

3 0
2 years ago
What evidence supports the ages of our planets, moon, sun, and asteroids
Pie

It is indeed true that scientists have known about the background radiation (commonly known as the Cosmic Microwave Background) since the early 60s. It was first discovered quite by accident by Penzias and Wilson working at Bell Labs, who detected it as an unexplainable interference in their precision radio equipment. When people finally figured out exactly what it was they were seeing, they won the Nobel Prize for their discovery. Only a few years before, George Gamow had predicted that if the Big Bang theory were correct, we should observe just such a background radiation. The CMB is not the only evidence in favor of the Big Bang, but it is one of the most important. It is a natural consequence of the theory, and is pretty unexplainable in steady-state cosmology.

The 15-20 billion year number comes not from the CMB, but rather predominantly from measurements of nearby and distant galaxies, particularly their rates of expansion away from us. We find that the distance to a galaxy is proportional to its recessional velocity. The constant of proportionality is the Hubble Constant, H, which turns out to be (approximately) the reciprocal of the age of the universe. So we measure the age by measuring recessional velocities. T = 1/H is only true, however, if the universe is not significantly accelerating or decelerating its expansion rate. If the rate of expansion is rapidly accelerating, the universe may be older than 1/H = 15 billion years, give or take. Such an acceleration would be caused by a large value of the Cosmological Constant, a sort of anti-gravity force predicted by General Relativity. There is some evidence that this might be the case.

So finally, yes, the age of the universe, being based on the empirical determination of H, is based on the observed evidence.

6 0
3 years ago
What is Gravitational force?​
mote1985 [20]

Answer:

the force of attraction between all masses in the universe; especially the attraction of the earth's mass for bodies near its surface

Explanation:

7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • A northbound train and a southbound train meet each other on parallel tracks heading in opposite directions. The northbound trai
    6·2 answers
  • Physical properties of minerals graphic organizer
    10·1 answer
  • The potential energy of a particle as a function of position will be given as U(x) = A x2 + B x + C, where U will be in joules w
    15·1 answer
  • What would most likely happen as a result of the generator in a wind turbine breaking? The blades would not be turned. Less stea
    5·2 answers
  • In which of these situations is convection most likely the main form of heat transfer? A.Warm air from a heater on the first flo
    11·2 answers
  • Can I also get help on this??
    13·2 answers
  • A. With what speed must a ball be thrown vertically from ground level to rise to a maximum height of 45m?
    14·1 answer
  • Explain the difference between the three types of friction
    6·1 answer
  • The half-life of argon-44 is 12 minutes. Suppose you start with 20 atoms of
    8·2 answers
  • Q5- Knowing now that your mood might affect your memory, what strategies could you employ to assist your memories and make sure
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!