Answer: Option (B) is the correct answer.
Explanation:
Equilibrium constant is defined as the relationship present between the amounts of products and reactants which are there at equilibrium in a reversible chemical reaction at a given temperature.
For example, 
Mathematically, ![K_{eq} = [C][D]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=K_%7Beq%7D%20%3D%20%5BC%5D%5BD%5D)
As the value of equilibrium constant depends on rate constants of the forward and reverse reactions. And, this rate of reaction also changes with change in pressure and temperature.
Therefore, it will also lead to change in equilibrium constant but it does not depend on initial amount pf reactants.
Thus, we can conclude that in general, the value of the equilibrium constant for a chemical reaction does NOT depend on the initial amounts of reactants present.
Electron configuration is the electron distribution in the molecular and atomic orbital. An element with configuration ns²np¹ will be in the 3A group. Thus, option B is correct.
<h3>What is electronic configuration?</h3>
The electronic configuration has been the arrangement and distribution of the sub-atomic particle, an electron in the atomic shells.
The electronic configuration given is, ns²np¹. Here, there are three valence electrons in the outermost orbit. As it has been known that the number of the valence electron gives the number of the group.
Therefore, option B. 3A group or 13 group is the correct option.
Learn more about electronic configuration here:
brainly.com/question/11182760
#SPJ4
Your question is incomplete, but most probably your full question was, An element with the general electron configuration for its outermost electrons of ns2np1 would be in which group?
a. 2a
b. 3a
c. 4a
d. 5a
e. 8a
Move the decimal place to the left 3 digits.
0.125
Hydrogen bonds are typically stronger than Van der Waals forces bc they are based on permanent dipoles, that form when hydrogen comes in vicinity of a highly electronegative atom (like F, N, or O). These bonds are long-lasting and pretty strong.
Answer:
c. CH4 < NH3 because the NH bond is more polar than the CH bond.
Explanation:
Actually, the electronegativity difference between carbon and hydrogen is just about 0.4. This meager difference in electronegativity corresponds to a nonpolar bond between the two atoms.
However, the electronegativity difference between nitrogen and hydrogen is about 0.9. This larger electronegativity difference corresponds to the existence of a polar covalent bond between the two atoms.
Hence the N-H bond is significantly polar unlike the C-H bond. This implies that CH4 molecules are only held together by weak dispersion forces while NH3 molecules are held together by stronger dipole-dipole interactions and hydrogen bonds.
