Answer:
that's because....
group 1 (e.g Na, K) those tend to lose one electron to gain noble gas electron configuration.
they can achieve that by just losing one electron from their outer shell.
as you go down the group 1, element gets bigger in size, which means there is more space between nucleus (which is in center of atom) and electron of outer shell. the more far away they are the less attraction force between them.
so its easier for potassuim to lose one electron than for lithuim.
so that means potassium will easily give up 1 electron to react with non metal or other element therefore it is more reactive than lithuim
but in case of non metal, the opposite happens but simple to understand.
as you go down the group 7 (halogen- Cl, Br, I) element will get bigger therefore force between nucleus and outer electron is getting smaller. they have to gain 1 electron in order to fill the outer shell (to gain noble gas electron configuration.)
as florine is more smaller in size than clorine it is more reactive because florine has more tendency to pull extra electron from metal or other element towards its side. so it easily gain 1 electron to react.
Answer:
well if you google how to find predicting product you will find the answer i dont think this counts as my answer but i tryed
Explanation:
Answer:150g of gold
Explanation: There is a lot more gold and gold is significantly significantly more dense than lithium
Answer:
s = 4.41 g/L.
Explanation:
¡Hola!
En este caso, considerando el escenario dado, se hace necesario para nosotros saber que la posible reacción de disociación la experimenta el cloruro de plomo (II) como se muestra a continuación:
Lo cual hace que la expresión de equilibrio se calcule como:
![Ksp=[Pb^{2+}][Cl^-]^2](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=Ksp%3D%5BPb%5E%7B2%2B%7D%5D%5BCl%5E-%5D%5E2)
Y que en términos de la solubilidad molar, s, se resuelve como:
![1.6x10^{-5}=s(2s)^2\\\\1.6x10^{-5}=4s^3\\\\s=\sqrt[3]{\frac{1.6x10^{-5}}{4} } \\\\s=0.0159molPbCl_2/L](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=1.6x10%5E%7B-5%7D%3Ds%282s%29%5E2%5C%5C%5C%5C1.6x10%5E%7B-5%7D%3D4s%5E3%5C%5C%5C%5Cs%3D%5Csqrt%5B3%5D%7B%5Cfrac%7B1.6x10%5E%7B-5%7D%7D%7B4%7D%20%7D%20%5C%5C%5C%5Cs%3D0.0159molPbCl_2%2FL)
Ahora, convertimos este valor a g/L al multiplicarlo por la masa molar del cloruro de plomo (II):
¡Saludos!
The empirical formula : MnO₂.
<h3>Further explanation</h3>
Given
632mg of manganese(Mn) = 0.632 g
368mg of oxygen(O) = 0.368 g
M Mn = 55
M O = 16
Required
The empirical formula
Solution
You didn't include the pictures, but the steps for finding the empirical formula are generally the same
- Find mol(mass : atomic mass)
Mn : 0.632 : 55 = 0.0115
O : 0.368 : 16 =0.023
- Divide by the smallest mol(Mn=0.0115)
Mn : O =
The empirical formula : MnO₂
