All categories

3 years ago

What is Newton's 3rd Law of Motion? *

Physics

2 answers:

drek231 [11]3 years ago

4 0

Answer:

Newton’s Third Law of Motion says that if a body A exerts a force on body B, then the body B exerts a force of equal magnitude, in the opposite direction, on the body A.

Explanation:

Alexandra [31]3 years ago

3 0

Answer:

For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction. The statement means that in every interaction, there is a pair of forces acting on the two interacting objects.

Explanation:

Every force sent into an object will sent a force in return.

If you smack a table, you can feel the table "push back"

You might be interested in

Failure to accomplish Erikson’s psychosocial task of late adulthood leads to despair.

Y_Kistochka [10]

False is the answer

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

The Reynolds number, rho VD/mu, is a very important parameter in fluid mechanics. Verify that the Reynolds number is dimensionle

Agata [3.3K]

Answer:

Re = 1 10⁴

Explanation:

Reynolds number is

Re = ρ v D /μ

The units of each term are

ρ = [kg / m³]

v = [m / s]

D = [m]

μ = [Pa s]

The pressure

Pa = [N / m²] = [Kg m / s²] 1 / [m²] = [kg / m s²]

μ = [Pa s] = [kg / m s²] [s] = [kg / m s]

We substitute the units in the equation

Re = [kg / m³] [m / s] [m] / [kg / m s]

Re = [kg / m s] / [m s / kg]

RE = [ ]

Reynolds number is a scalar

Let's evaluate for the given point

Where the data for methane are:

viscosity μ = 11.2 10⁻⁶ Pa s

the density ρ = 0.656 kg / m³

D = 2 in (2.54 10⁻² m / 1 in) = 5.08 10⁻² m

Re = 0.656 4 2 5.08 10⁻² /11.2 10⁻⁶

Re = 1.19 10⁴

4 0

3 years ago

If the distance of a galaxy is 2,000 Mpc, how many years back into the past are we looking when we observe this galaxy

ruslelena [56]

The age of the galaxy when we look back is 13.97 billion years.

The given parameters:

<em>distance of the galaxy, x = 2,000 Mpc</em>

According Hubble's law the age of the universe is calculated as follows;

v = H₀x

where;

H₀ = 70 km/s/Mpc

$T = \frac{x}{V} \\\\T = \frac{x}{xH_0} \\\\T = \frac{1}{H_0} \\\\T = \frac{1}{70 \ km/s/Mpc} \\\\T = \frac{1 \ sec}{70 \times 3.24 \times 10^{-20} } \\\\T = 4.41 \times 10^{17} \ sec\\\\T = \frac{4.41 \times 10^{17} \ sec\ \times \ years}{3600 \ s \ \times\ 24\ h\ \times \ 365.25 \ days} \\\\T = 1.397 \times 10^{10} \ years\\\\T = 13.97 \ billion \ years$

Thus, the age of the galaxy when we look back is 13.97 billion years.

Learn more about Hubble's law here: brainly.com/question/19819028

8 0

2 years ago

The refractive index n of transparent acrylic plastic (full name Poly(methyl methacrylate)) depends on the color (wavelength) of

Novosadov [1.4K]

Answer:

The angle between the blue beam and the red beam in the acrylic block is

$\theta _d =0.19 ^o$

Explanation:

From the question we are told that

The refractive index of the transparent acrylic plastic for blue light is $n_F = 1.497$

The wavelength of the blue light is $F = 486.1 nm = 486.1 *10^{-9} \ m$

The refractive index of the transparent acrylic plastic for red light is $n_C = 1.488$

The wavelength of the red light is $C = 656.3 nm = 656.3 *10^{-9} \ m$

The incidence angle is $i = 45^o$

Generally from Snell's law the angle of refraction of the blue light in the acrylic block is mathematically represented as

$r_F = sin ^{-1}[\frac{sin(i) * n_a }{n_F} ]$

Where $n_a$ is the refractive index of air which have a value of $n_a = 1$

$r_F = sin ^{-1}[\frac{sin(45) * 1 }{ 1.497} ]$

$r_F = 28.18^o$

Generally from Snell's law the angle of refraction of the red light in the acrylic block is mathematically represented as

$r_C = sin ^{-1}[\frac{sin(i) * n_a }{n_C} ]$

Where $n_a$ is the refractive index of air which have a value of $n_a = 1$

$r_C = sin ^{-1}[\frac{sin(45) * 1 }{ 1.488} ]$

$r_F = 28.37^o$

The angle between the blue beam and the red beam in the acrylic block

$\theta _d = r_C - r_F$

substituting values

$\theta _d = 28.37 - 28.18$

$\theta _d =0.19 ^o$

4 0

3 years ago

Based upon the information you have learned throughout this module on blood spatter analysis, do you feel that analyzing blood s

kompoz [17]

Answer:

I do not think that it is the most reliable way to gain information since it is very hard to do and can be easily messed up. No, I don't think you can charge someone on only evidence from blood spatter, but if there was additional evidence I think that this would definitely help with the case but not on its own, since it doesn’t give you physical evidence about the suspect.

Explanation:

6 0

2 years ago