Answer:
The only one that makes sense IF the model behaves as the Earth is D.
Explanation:
Answer:
There was an improvement in accuracy. There was no change in precision.
Explanation:
<em>The average mass after recalibration is closer to the mass of the standard, </em>so the recalibration improved the accuracy<em> </em>(the measurement is closer to an accepted 'true' value).
The standard deviation did not change, so the precision (or how disperse the measurements are) was not affected.
40×19.32/100=7.7=8×2=16Ca
35.5×34.30/100=12.1=12×2=24Cl
16×46.38/100=7.4=7×2=14O
Answer:

Explanation:
Hello,
In this case, is possible to infer that the thermal equilibrium is governed by the following relationship:

Thus, both iron's and water's heat capacities are: 0.444 and 4.18 J/g°C respectively, so one solves for the mass of water as shown below:

Best regards.
B
A qualitative observation describes the characteristics of a substance without quantifying them.