The number of grams of radon 222 did it have 15.2 ago was 49.6 grams( answer C)
<u>calculation</u>
- calculate the number of half life it has covered from 15.2 days to 3.8 days
that is divide 15.2/ 3.8 = 4 half life
- half life is time taken for a radio activity of a specified isotope to fall to half its original mass
therefore 3.8 days ago it was 3.1 x2 = 6.2 grams
7.6 days ago it was 6.2 x2 = 12.4 grams
11.4 days ago it was 12.4 x2= 24.8 grams
15.2 days ago it was 24.8 x2=49.6 grams
Answer:
The result is a superposition which is twice the amplitude of each input wave. Φ = π means the two waves are completely OUT OF PHASE, and so add completely destructively. The result is a superposition which has no amplitude at all.
Explanation:
The result is a superposition which is twice the amplitude of each input wave. Φ = π means the two waves are completely OUT OF PHASE, and so add completely destructively. The result is a superposition which has no amplitude at all.
Answer:
Kp = 0.049
Explanation:
The equilibrium in question is;
2 SO₂ (g) + O₂ (g) ⇄ 2 SO₃ (g)
Kp = p SO₃² / ( p SO₂² x p O₂ )
The initial pressures are given, so lets set up the ICE table for the equilibrium:
atm SO₂ O₂ SO₃
I 3.3 0.79 0
C -2x -x 2x
E 3.3 - 2x 0.79 - x 2x
We are told 2x = partial pressure of SO₃ is 0.47 atm at equilibrium, so we can determine the partial pressures of SO₂ and O₂ as follows:
p SO₂ = 3.3 -0.47 atm = 2.83 atm
p O₂ = 0.79 - (0.47/2) atm = .56 atm
Now we can calculate Kp:
Kp = 0.47² /[ ( 2.83 )² x 0.56 ] = 0.049 ( rounded to 2 significant figures )
Note that we have extra data in this problem we did not need since once we setup the ICE table for the equilibrium we realize we have all the information needed to solve the question.
Option a) H-H is the correct answer
Answer:
The correct approach is Option B (Peer Review).
Explanation:
- Rather made reference to someone as a scientific peer-review, it encourages the specialist who has not been essential to the study team to analyze the study objectively and pointed out everyone's mistakes. It serves as major self-regulation for scholars and aims to make the publishing process somewhat credible. Hence, the solution to this issue is Peer Examination.
- Funding organizations rarely have the capabilities to recognize out mistakes, whereas definitive analysis is a method of study that helps to make a definitive statement. The gathering of data is simply a process of scientific study.
Other approaches do not apply to the example mentioned. Although the one mentioned is right.
