All categories

3 years ago

What is the speed of a bobsled whose distance-time graph indicates that it traveled 119m in 29s?

Physics

2 answers:

Assoli18 [71]3 years ago

7 0

Do 112m /29s which it will be 3.862 which if you round it, it will be 3.86 m/s

solmaris [256]3 years ago

5 0

So, for every 1 second, how many meters did the bobsled travel? Do this by dividing 119 by 29. This answer will be meters per second. If you need meters per minute, simply multiply by 60.

You might be interested in

A friend rides, in turn, the rims of three fast merry-go-rounds while holding a sound source that emits isotropically at a certa

Aliun [14]

Complete Question

The complete question is shown on the first uploaded image

Answer:

The Ranking of the curve according to their speed would be equal Rank because $v_1 =v_2 =v_3$

The first frequency would have a higher rank compared to the other two which will have the same ranking when ranked with respect to their angular velocities because

$w_1 >w_2 = w_3$

The ranking of the second third frequency would be the same but their ranking would be greater than that of the first frequency because

$r_2 =r_3 >r_1$

Explanation:

Mathematically Frequency can be represented as

$F = \frac{v}{\lambda}$

Where $\lambda$ is the wavelength and v is the velocity

Now looking at the diagram we see that

For the first frequency we have

Let the wavelength be $\lambda_1 = \lambda$ , and the frequency $F_1 = F$

For the second frequency

Let the wavelength be $\lambda_2 = 2 \lambda$ , and the frequency $F_2 = \frac{F}{2}$

For the third frequency

Let the wavelength be $\lambda_3 = 2\lambda$ , and the frequency $F_3 = \frac{F}{2}$

To obtain v for each of the frequency we make v the subject in the equation above for each frequency

So,

For the first frequency we have

$v_1 = \lambda_1 F_1 = \lambda F$

For the second frequency

$v_2 = \lambda_2 F_2 = 2 \lambda*\frac{F} {2} = \lambda F$

For the third frequency

$v_3 = \lambda_3 F_3 = 2 \lambda*\frac{F} {2} = \lambda F$

Hence

The Ranking of the curve according to their speed would be equal Rank because $v_1 =v_2 =v_3$

Mathematically angular speed can be represented as

$w = 2 \pi f$

For the first frequency we have

$w_1 = 2\pi F_1 = 2 \pi F$

For the second frequency

$w_2 = 2 \pi F_2 = 2 \pi \frac{F}{2} = \pi F$

For the third frequency

$w_3 = 2 \pi F_3 = 2 \pi \frac{F}{2} = \pi F$

Hence

The first frequency would have a higher rank compared to the other two which will have the same ranking when ranked with respect to their angular velocities because

$w_1 >w_2 = w_3$

Mathematically the relationship between the angular velocity and the linear velocity can be represented as

$v = wr$

=> $r = \frac{v}{w}$

Since the linear velocity is constant we have that

$r \ \alpha \ \frac{1}{w}$

This means that r varies inversely to the angular velocity ,What this means for ranking due to the radius is that the ranking of the second third frequency would be the same but their ranking would be greater than that of the first frequency because

$r_2 =r_3 >r_1$

5 0

3 years ago

Frick and Frack are standing back-to-back, leaning on each other, but not moving. If Frick weighs

mylen [45]

Answer:

Frick is pushing harder

Explanation:

if Frack weighs more and he was pushing harder they would be moving, but if Frick pushes harder then they wont move

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Ok these are my last points say hi if u want brainliest

lawyer [7]

Answer:

Explanation:

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Professional Application. A 96 kg football player catches a 0.900 kg ball with his feet off the ground with both of them moving

Zarrin [17]

To solve this problem it is necessary to apply the equations related to the conservation of momentum.

This definition can be expressed as

$m_1u_1+m_2u_2 = (m_1+m_2)V_f$

Where

$m_{1,2}$ = Mass of each object

$u_{1,2}$ = Initial Velocity of each object

$V_f$ = Final velocity

Rearranging the equation to find the final velocity we have,

$V_f = \frac{m_1u_1+m_2u_2}{(m_1+m_2)}$

Our values are given as

$m_1 = 96Kg\\m_2 = 0.9Kg\\u_1 = 6.3m/s\\u_2 = 27.4m/s$

Replacing we have,

$V_f = \frac{(96)(6.3)+(0.9)(27.4)}{(96+0.9)}$

$V_f = 6.4959m/s$

Therefore the final velocity is 6.5m/s

3 0

3 years ago

2CO + 2NO → 2CO2 + N2 is it balannced

natita [175]

If the same atoms appear on both sides, then it's balanced.

In this reaction, there are 4 Oxygens, 2 Carbons, and 2 Nitrogens on each side. So numerically, <em>it's balanced</em>. But I don't know enough chemistry to say whether the reaction is possible.

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers