The amplitude of the wave is the 'full height of the wave.' Amplitude is measured in m (meters) and is measured over the change of a single period.
Answer:
x ’= 1,735 m, measured from the far left
Explanation:
For the system to be in equilibrium, the law of rotational equilibrium must be fulfilled.
Let's fix a reference system located at the point of rotation and that the anticlockwise rotations have been positive
They tell us that we have a mass (m1) on the left side and another mass (M2) on the right side,
the mass that is at the left end x = 1.2 m measured from the pivot point, the mass of the right side is at a distance x and the weight of the body that is located at the geometric center of the bar
x_{cm} = 1.2 -1
x_ {cm} = 0.2 m
Σ τ = 0
w₁ 1.2 + mg 0.2 - W₂ x = 0
x =
x = 
let's calculate
x =
2.9 1.2 + 4 0.2 / 8
x = 0.535 m
measured from the pivot point
measured from the far left is
x’= 1,2 + x
x'= 1.2 + 0.535
x ’= 1,735 m
Answer:
293k
Explanation:
In this question, we are asked to calculate the temperature to which the reaction must be heated to double the equilibrium constant.
To find this value, we will need to use the Van’t Hoff equation.
Please check attachment for complete solution
Answer:
a)n= 3.125 x
electrons.
b)J= 1.515 x
A/m²
c)
=1.114 x
m/s
d) see explanation
Explanation:
Current 'I' = 5A =>5C/s
diameter 'd'= 2.05 x
m
radius 'r' = d/2 => 1.025 x
m
no. of electrons 'n'= 8.5 x
a) the amount of electrons pass through the light bulb each second can be determined by:
I= Q/t
Q= I x t => 5 x 1
Q= 5C
As we know that: Q= ne
where e is the charge of electron i.e 1.6 x
C
n= Q/e => 5/ 1.6 x 
n= 3.125 x
electrons.
b) the current density 'J' in the wire is given by
J= I/A => I/πr²
J= 5 / (3.14 x (1.025x
)²)
J= 1.515 x
A/m²
c) The typical speed'
' of an electron is given by:
=
=1.515 x
/ 8.5 x
x |-1.6 x
|
=1.114 x
m/s
d) According to these equations,
J= I/A
=
=
If you were to use wire of twice the diameter, the current density and drift speed will change
Increase in the diameter increase the cross sectional area and decreases the current density as it has inverse relation.
Also drift velocity will decrease as it is inversely proportional to the area
Ok i apologise for the messy working but I'll try and explain my attempt at logic
Also note i ignore any air resistance for this.
First i wrote the two equations I'd most likely need for this situation, the kinetic energy equation and the potential energy equation.
Because the energy right at the top of the swing motion is equal to the energy right in the "bottom" of the swing's motion (due to conservation of energy), i made the kinetic energy equal to the potential energy as indicated by Ek = Ep.
I also noted the "initial" and "final" height of the swing with hi and hf respectively.
So initially looking at this i thought, what the heck, there's no mass. Then i figured that using the conservation of energy law i could take the mass value from the Ek equation and use it in the Ep equation. So what i did was take the Ek equation and rearranged it for m as you can hopefully see. Then i substituted the rearranged Ek equation into the Ep equation.
So then the equation reads something like Ep = (rearranged Ek equation for m) × g (which is -9.81) × change in height (hf - hi).
Then i simplify the equation a little. When i multiply both sides by v^2 i can clearly see that there is one E on each side (at that stage i don't need to clarify which type of energy it is because Ek = Ep so they're just the same anyway). So i just canceled them out and square rooted both sides.
The answer i got was that the max velocity would be 4.85m/s 3sf, assuming no losses (eg energy lost to friction).
I do hope I'm right and i suppose it's better than a blank piece of paper good luck my dude xx