The atom that is the most electronegative is fluorine (F).
<h3>
What is electronegative?</h3>
Electronegativity, is the tendency for an atom of a given chemical element to attract shared electrons when forming a chemical bond.
Electronegativity increases across the groups from left to right of the periodic table and decreases down the group.
Examples of electronegative elements arranged in decreasing order;
- fluorine,
- oxygen,
- nitrogen,
- chlorine,
- bromine,
- iodine,
- sulfur,
- carbon, and
- hydrogen.
Thus, the atom that is the most electronegative is fluorine (F).
Learn more about electronegativity here: brainly.com/question/24977425
#SPJ1
Answer:
The potential difference between the ends of a wire is 60 volts.
Explanation:
It is given that,
Resistance, R = 5 ohms
Charge, q = 720 C
Time, t = 1 min = 60 s
We know that the charge flowing per unit charge is called current in the circuit. It is given by :
I = 12 A
Let V is the potential difference between the ends of a wire. It can be calculated using Ohm's law as :
V = IR
V = 60 Volts
So, the potential difference between the ends of a wire is 60 volts. Hence, this is the required solution.
Answer:
The value is 
Explanation:
From the question we are told that
The Coulomb constant is 
The charge on the electron/proton is 
The mass of proton 
The mass of electron is 
Generally for the electron to be held up by the force gravity
Then
Electric force on the electron = The gravitational Force
i.e
Answer: hope it helps you...❤❤❤❤
Explanation: If your values have dimensions like time, length, temperature, etc, then if the dimensions are not the same then the values are not the same. So a “dimensionally wrong equation” is always false and cannot represent a correct physical relation.
No, not necessarily.
For instance, Newton’s 2nd law is F=p˙ , or the sum of the applied forces on a body is equal to its time rate of change of its momentum. This is dimensionally correct, and a correct physical relation. It’s fine.
But take a look at this (incorrect) equation for the force of gravity:
F=−G(m+M)Mm√|r|3r
It has all the nice properties you’d expect: It’s dimensionally correct (assuming the standard traditional value for G ), it’s attractive, it’s symmetric in the masses, it’s inverse-square, etc. But it doesn’t correspond to a real, physical force.
It’s a counter-example to the claim that a dimensionally correct equation is necessarily a correct physical relation.
A simpler counter example is 1=2 . It is stating the equality of two dimensionless numbers. It is trivially dimensionally correct. But it is false.
