1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
anzhelika [568]
3 years ago
14

Help me please? I don't understand

Chemistry
1 answer:
Vera_Pavlovna [14]3 years ago
4 0

K=\frac{B}{A}

K= \frac{2}{A}

You might be interested in
Consider the following reaction. Zn(s) 2agno3(aq) --> 2ag(s) zn(no3)2(aq)when 16. 2 g of silver was produced, _____ mole(s) o
Crazy boy [7]

The required amount of silver nitrate to produce 16.2g of silver is 25.48 grams.

<h3>What is the relation between mass & moles?</h3>

Relation between the mass and moles of any substance will be represented as:

n = W/M, where

  • W = given mass
  • M = molar mass

Moles of silver = 16.2g / 107.8g/mol = 0.15mol

From the stoichiometry of the given reaction it is clear that, same moles of silver nitrate is required to produce same moles of silver. So 0.15 moles of silver nitrate is required.

Mass of silver nitrate = (0.15mol)(169.87g/mol) = 25.48g

Hence required mass of silver nitrate is 25.48g.

To know more about mass & moles, visit the below link:

brainly.com/question/19784089

#SPJ4

5 0
2 years ago
1s^2 2s^2 2p^6 3s^2 3p^6 how many unpaired electrons are in the atom represented by the electron configuration above?
Sedbober [7]
It's a combination of factors:
Less electrons paired in the same orbital
More electrons with parallel spins in separate orbitals
Pertinent valence orbitals NOT close enough in energy for electron pairing to be stabilized enough by large orbital size
DISCLAIMER: Long answer, but it's a complicated issue, so... :)
A lot of people want to say that it's because a "half-filled subshell" increases stability, which is a reason, but not necessarily the only reason. However, for chromium, it's the significant reason.
It's also worth mentioning that these reasons are after-the-fact; chromium doesn't know the reasons we come up with; the reasons just have to be, well, reasonable.
The reasons I can think of are:
Minimization of coulombic repulsion energy
Maximization of exchange energy
Lack of significant reduction of pairing energy overall in comparison to an atom with larger occupied orbitals
COULOMBIC REPULSION ENERGY
Coulombic repulsion energy is the increased energy due to opposite-spin electron pairing, in a context where there are only two electrons of nearly-degenerate energies.
So, for example...
↑
↓
−−−−−

↑
↓
−−−−−

↑
↓
−−−−− is higher in energy than
↑
↓
−−−−−

↓
↑
−−−−−

↑
↓
−−−−−
To make it easier on us, we can crudely "measure" the repulsion energy with the symbol
Π
c
. We'd just say that for every electron pair in the same orbital, it adds one
Π
c
unit of destabilization.
When you have something like this with parallel electron spins...
↑
↓
−−−−−

↑
↓
−−−−−

↑
↓
−−−−−
It becomes important to incorporate the exchange energy.
EXCHANGE ENERGY
Exchange energy is the reduction in energy due to the number of parallel-spin electron pairs in different orbitals.
It's a quantum mechanical argument where the parallel-spin electrons can exchange with each other due to their indistinguishability (you can't tell for sure if it's electron 1 that's in orbital 1, or electron 2 that's in orbital 1, etc), reducing the energy of the configuration.
For example...
↑
↓
−−−−−

↑
↓
−−−−−

↑
↓
−−−−− is lower in energy than
↑
↓
−−−−−

↓
↑
−−−−−

↑
↓
−−−−−
To make it easier for us, a crude way to "measure" exchange energy is to say that it's equal to
Π
e
for each pair that can exchange.
So for the first configuration above, it would be stabilized by
Π
e
(
1
↔
2
), but the second configuration would have a
0
Π
e
stabilization (opposite spins; can't exchange).
PAIRING ENERGY
Pairing energy is just the combination of both the repulsion and exchange energy. We call it
Π
, so:
Π
=
Π
c
+
Π
e

Inorganic Chemistry, Miessler et al.
Inorganic Chemistry, Miessler et al.
Basically, the pairing energy is:
higher when repulsion energy is high (i.e. many electrons paired), meaning pairing is unfavorable
lower when exchange energy is high (i.e. many electrons parallel and unpaired), meaning pairing is favorable
So, when it comes to putting it together for chromium... (
4
s
and
3
d
orbitals)
↑
↓
−−−−−
↑
↓
−−−−−

↑
↓
−−−−−

↑
↓
−−−−−

↑
↓
−−−−−

↑
↓
−−−−−
compared to
↑
↓
−−−−−
↑
↓
−−−−−

↑
↓
−−−−−

↑
↓
−−−−−

↑
↓
−−−−−

↑
↓
−−−−−
is more stable.
For simplicity, if we assume the
4
s
and
3
d
electrons aren't close enough in energy to be considered "nearly-degenerate":
The first configuration has
Π
=
10
Π
e
.
(Exchanges:
1
↔
2
,
1
↔
3
,
1
↔
4
,
1
↔
5
,
2
↔
3
,

2
↔
4
,
2
↔
5
,
3
↔
4
,
3
↔
5
,
4
↔
5
)
The second configuration has
Π
=
Π
c
+
6
Π
e
.
(Exchanges:
1
↔
2
,
1
↔
3
,
1
↔
4
,
2
↔
3
,
2
↔
4
,
3
↔
4
)
Technically, they are about
3.29 eV
apart (Appendix B.9), which means it takes about
3.29 V
to transfer a single electron from the
3
d
up to the
4
s
.
We could also say that since the
3
d
orbitals are lower in energy, transferring one electron to a lower-energy orbital is helpful anyways from a less quantitative perspective.
COMPLICATIONS DUE TO ORBITAL SIZE
Note that for example,
W
has a configuration of
[
X
e
]
5
d
4
6
s
2
, which seems to contradict the reasoning we had for
Cr
, since the pairing occurred in the higher-energy orbital.
But, we should also recognize that
5
d
orbitals are larger than
3
d
orbitals, which means the electron density can be more spread out for
W
than for
Cr
, thus reducing the pairing energy
Π
.
That is,
Π
W
5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Write the formulas for the following compounds: (a) rubidium nitrite, (b) potassium sulfide, (c) sodium hydrogen sulfide, (d) ma
choli [55]

Answer:

All are having different valent cation and anion like mono,di and trivalent polyatomic ions .

A. RbNO3

B. K2S

C. NaHS

D. Mg3(PO4)2 formed by divalent Mg+2 and trivalent PO43-

E. CaHPO4

F. PbCO3 , lead is in Pb+2 form

G. SnF2

H. (NH4)2SO4

I. AgClO4

J. BCl3

6 0
3 years ago
How many grams of CO are produced when 41.0 g of C reacts?
CaHeK987 [17]

Answer:

95.7 g CO to the nearest tenth.

Explanation:

2C + O2 ---> 2CO

Using relative atomic masses:

24 g C produces  2*12 + 2*16 g CO.

So 41 g produces  ( (2*12 + 2*16) * 41  ) / 24

= 95.7 g CO,

7 0
2 years ago
Draw a chair conformation for cis-1-bromo-2,4-dimethylcyclohexane showing equatorial and axial positions at the carbon atoms bea
Ahat [919]

Answer:

See attachment.

Explanation:

Mono-substituted cyclohexanes are more stable with their substituents in an equatorial position. However, with poly-substituted cyclohexanes, the situation is more complex since the steric effects of all substituents have to be taken into account. In this case, you can see that <u>the interconversion is shifted towards the conformation in the bottom because there is less tension between the substituents</u>.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which is the number of valence electrons in cadmium (Cd)?
    10·2 answers
  • What data should be plotted to show that experimental concentration data fits a zeroth-order reaction?
    15·1 answer
  • A vessel of volume 22.4 dm3 contains 20 mol h2 and 1 mol n2 ad 273.15 k initially. All of the nitrogen reacted with sufficient h
    8·1 answer
  • Why do you think lab safety is important?
    13·2 answers
  • Which of the following molecules nonpolar?
    15·1 answer
  • A 62.6-gram piece of heated limestone is placed into 75.0 grams of water at 23.1°C. The limestone and the water come to a final
    13·1 answer
  • A 0.085 M solution of a weak acid has a pH of 2.68. Determine the Ka value for this acid.
    6·1 answer
  • How would one make a 2 M solution of a compound?
    11·2 answers
  • Nitrogen gas can be prepared by passing gaseous ammonia over solid copper (II) oxide at high temperatures. If 18.1 g of Nh3 is r
    11·1 answer
  • 2) A bubble has formed in kneaded bread dough before
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!