Answer is: carbon.
<span>During gamma emission the nucleus emits radiation without
changing its composition, if for example have nucleus with six
protons and six neutrons (carbon atom) and after gamma decay there
is nucleus with six protons and six neutrons.
Gamma rays are the electromagnetic waves with
the shortest wavelengths (1 pm), highest frequencies (300 EHz) and
highest energy (1,24 MeV).</span>
The mass of water produced is 792 grams by the combustion of 568 grams of decane.
Given:
Combustion of 568 grams of decane with 2979 grams of oxygen.

To find:
The mass of water produced by combustion of 568 grams of decane.
Solution:
Mass of decane = 568 g
Moles of decane :
= 
Mass of oxygen gas = 2976 g
Moles of oxygen gas:
= 

According to reaction, 2 moles of decane reacts with 31 moles of oxygen, then 4 moles of decane will react with:

But according to the question, we have 93.0 moles of oxygen gas which is more than 62 moles of oxygen gas.
So, this means that oxygen gas is present in an excessive amount. Which simply means:
- Oxygen gas is an excessive reagent.
- Decane is a limiting reagent.
- Decane being limiting reagent will be responsible for the amount of water produced after the reaction.
According to reaction, 22 moles of water is produced from 2 moles of decane, then 4 moles of decane will produce:

Mass of 44 moles of water ;

792 grams of water is produced by the combustion of 568 grams of decane.
Learn more about limiting reagent and excessive reagent here:
brainly.com/question/14225536?referrer=searchResults
brainly.com/question/7144022?referrer=searchResults
Answer:
Hydrogen may not be advantageous as a fuel because...
- Its expensive
- Its difficult to store
- Its highly flammable
- Its dependent on fossil fuels
Explanation:
Its expensive - Not only is hydrogen gas expensive, but it also takes a lot of work to free from other elements. It is both expensive and time-consuming to produce.
Its difficult to store - Moving hydrogen is not an easy task. Moving anything more than small amounts of hydrogen was also very expensive, making it impractical.
Its highly flammable - When exposed to the atmosphere, hydrogen could potentially form explosive mixtures.
Its dependent on fossil fuels - Hydrogen energy itself is renewable. However, the process of separating it from oxygen uses non-renewable sources such as coal and oil.
~Hope this Helps!~
This hypothetical process would produce actinium-230.
<h3>Explanation</h3>
An alpha decay reduces the atomic number of a nucleus by two and its mass number by four.
There are two types of beta decay: beta minus β⁻ and beta plus β⁺.
The mass number of a nucleus <em>stays the same</em> in either process. In β⁻ decay, the atomic number <em>increases </em>by one. An electron e⁻ is produced. In β⁺ decay, the atomic number <em>decreases </em>by one. A positron e⁺ is produced. Positrons are antiparticles of electrons.
β⁻ are more common than β⁺ in decays involving uranium. Assuming that the "beta decay" here refers to β⁻ decay.
Gamma decays do not influence the atomic or mass number of a nucleus.
Uranium has an atomic number of 92. 238 is the mass number of this particular isotope. The hypothetical product would have an atomic number of 92 - 2 ⨯ 2 + 1 = 89. Actinium has atomic number 89. As a result, the product is an isotope of actinium. The mass number of this hypothetical isotope would be 238 - 2 ⨯ 4 = 230. Therefore, actinium-230 is produced.
The overall nuclear reaction would involve five different particles. On the reactant side, there is
On the product side, there are
- one actinium-230 atom,
- two alpha particles (a.k.a. helium-4 nuclei),
- one electron, and
- one gamma particle (a.k.a. photon).

Consider: what would be the products if the nucleus undergoes a β⁺ decay instead?