Hello! The nontoxic, nonflammable chemicals containing atoms of carbon, chlorine, and fluorine that have created a hole in the ozone layer are the Chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs)
These are compounds developed and improved by Thomas Midgley in the late 1920s. They were used as refrigerants and aerosol propellants.
These compounds created a hole in the ozone layer by the following reactions:
CCl₃F → CCl₂F· + Cl· (In the presence of light. Radical Reaction)
Cl· + O₃ → ClO + O₂
ClO + O₃ → Cl· + O₂
The last 2 reactions can repeat in a radical mechanism and explain why these compounds are so harmful to the ozone layer.
Answer:
K = m g (A - A2)
Explanation:
In a block spring system the total energy is the sum of the potential energy plus the kinetic energy, for maximum elongation all the energy is potential
Em = U₀ = m g A
For when the system is at an ele
Elongation A2 less than A, energy has two parts
Em = K + U₂
K = Em –U₂
We substitute
K = m g A - m gA2
K = m g (A - A2)
Answer:
r₁/r₂ = 1/2 = 0.5
Explanation:
The resistance of a wire is given by the following formula:
R = ρL/A
where,
R = Resistance of wire
ρ = resistivity of the material of wire
L = Length of wire
A = Cross-sectional area of wire = πr²
r = radius of wire
Therefore,
R = ρL/πr²
<u>FOR WIRE A</u>:
R₁ = ρ₁L₁/πr₁² -------- equation 1
<u>FOR WIRE B</u>:
R₂ = ρ₂L₂/πr₂² -------- equation 2
It is given that resistance of wire A is four times greater than the resistance of wire B.
R₁ = 4 R₂
using values from equation 1 and equation 2:
ρ₁L₁/πr₁² = 4ρ₂L₂/πr₂²
since, the material and length of both wires are same.
ρ₁ = ρ₂ = ρ
L₁ = L₂ = L
Therefore,
ρL/πr₁² = 4ρL/πr₂²
1/r₁² = 4/r₂²
r₁²/r₂² = 1/4
taking square root on both sides:
<u>r₁/r₂ = 1/2 = 0.5</u>
Answer:
The the analysis for the free fall part should be done under the constant acceleration.
Explanation:
In the given problem, the jumper is falling under the free fall. Since, no external force is acting on the body therefore, the fall will be under the action gravity only. also, the acceleration due to gravity is always constant.
Therefore, the the analysis for the free fall part should be done under the constant acceleration.
Amount of work done is zero and so power = 0 watts.
<u>Explanation:</u>
Power is the rate at which work is done, or W divided by delta t. Since the barbell is not moving, the weightlifter is not doing work on the barbell.Therefore, if the work done is zero, then the power is also zero.It may seem unusual that the data given in question is versatile i.e. A weightlifter exerts an upward force on a 1000-N barbell and holds it at a height of 1 meter for 2 seconds. But, still the answer is zero watts , this was a tricky question although conceptual basis of question was good! Power is dependent on amount of work done which is further related to displacement and here the net displacement is zero ! Hence, amount of work done is zero and so power = 0 watts.
