Answer:
The main difference between the two models was about the location of the electron in an atom.
Explanation:
<u>Rutherford described that:</u>
- The electrons were outside of the nucleus.
- They were equal in number to the "positiveness" of the nucleus.
- Also, He randomly placed the negative electrons outside the nucleus.
<u>Bohr improved the Rutherford model:</u>
- Bohr placed the electrons in distinct energy levels.
- Electrons only exist in fixed orbitals (shells) and not anywhere in between.
- Each shell has a fixed energy
- Rutherford explained the nucleus of an atom, while Bohr was more into the electrons and their energy levels.
(6.0×10^4) = 60,000
(3.1×10^-1) = 0.31
60,000 × 0.31 = 18,600
In an experiment it is known what quantity has to measured, thus the measurement of melting point has been determining what data to collect. Thus, Option B is correct.
To investigate the boiling point of water and ethanol, the samples has to boiled at constant parameters and the data has been collected with several trials. Thus, option C is correct.
Melting has been described as the change of the solid to the liquid state. With melting, there has been heat energy higher than the force of attraction allowing the molecules to move freely. Thus, option B is correct.
The boiling has been the change in the water at liquid state to the gaseous state. With boiling there is thermal energy capable of increasing the motion of water molecules overcoming electrostatic force.
For more information about melting, refer to the link:
brainly.com/question/12499685
The answer for this is CH4N20
Answer:
Electronegativity increases left to right across a row in the periodic table e.g. C < N < O < F<. b
