All categories

3 years ago

Scientist use conversion factors to express the given value of a unit different type of unit true or false

Physics

2 answers:

kykrilka [37]3 years ago

4 0

True.

<span>Scientist use conversion factors to express the given value of a unit different type of unit</span>

Alex17521 [72]3 years ago

3 0

Answer:

The statement "Scientist use conversion factors to express the given value of a unit different type of unit" is true.

Explanation:

A conversion factor is a mathematical operation, to make changes of units of the same magnitude, or to calculate the equivalence between the multiples and submultiples of a given unit of measure.

It consists of multiplying the original quantity by a fraction in which the numerator and denominator contain the same quantity but expressed in different units, in order to simplify the original unit and obtain the new unit.

<u><em>The statement "Scientist use conversion factors to express the given value of a unit different type of unit" is true.</em></u>

You might be interested in

What are the effects of global warming in simple words?

alukav5142 [94]

Answer is Global Warming causes destruction of our ecosystem due to increased temperatures, drought, fire, weed and pest infestations, more intense storms, water shortages, melting ice caps and glaciers, air pollution.

3 0

1 year ago

What is 178.57 rounded to the nearest whole number

postnew [5]

<h2><em>THANK</em><em> </em><em>YOU</em><em> </em></h2>

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Which statement best defines constructive interference? O Energy reflects back toward the source of its power. O Two waves with

Brums [2.3K]

Answer: two waves with identical crests and troughs meet

Explanation:

My teacher gave me the answer

4 0

3 years ago

Where does the kinetic energy come fromwhen you roll down a hill?

Lapatulllka [165]

From the change of GPE into KE. Conservation of energy tells us this.

8 0

4 years ago

Assume that the electric field E is equal to zero at a given point. Does it mean that the electric potential V must also be equa

lyudmila [28]

Answer:

No, this doesn't mean the electric potential equals zero.

Explanation:

In electrostatics, the electric field $\vec{E}$ is related to the gradient of the electric potential V with :

$\vec{E} (\vec{r}) = - \vec{\nabla} V (\vec{r})$

This means that for constant electric potential the electric field must be zero:

$V(\vec{r}) = k$

$\vec{E} (\vec{r}) = - \vec{\nabla} V (\vec{r}) = - \vec{\nabla} k$

$\vec{E} (\vec{r}) = - (\frac{\partial}{\partial x} , \frac{\partial}{\partial y } , \frac{\partial}{\partial z}) k$

$\vec{E} (\vec{r}) = - (\frac{\partial k}{\partial x} , \frac{\partial k}{\partial y } , \frac{\partial k}{\partial z})$

$\vec{E} (\vec{r}) = - (0,0,0)$

This is not the only case in which we would find an zero electric field, as, any scalar field with gradient zero will give an zero electric field. For example:

$V(\vec{r})= (x+2)^2 (y+4)^3 (z+5)^4$

give an electric field of zero at point (0,0,0)

8 0

3 years ago