Choice - B is the correct one.
At the top of the arc, at one end of the swing:
-- it's not going to get any higher, so the potential energy is maximum
-- it stops moving for an instant, so the kinetic energy is zero
At the bottom of the arc, in the center of the swing:
-- it's not going to get any lower, so the potential energy is minimum
-- it's not going to move any faster, so the kinetic energy is maximum
Explanation:
The US Supreme Court has affirmed in Miller v. Johnson (1995) that racial gerrymandering is a violation of constitutional rights and upheld decisions against redistricting that is purposely devised based on race. However, the Supreme Court has struggled as to when partisan gerrymandering occurs (Vieth v.
Answer:
Explanation:
A chemical change.
Usually those are irreversible. Or they may be reversible, but the form they take may leave your object not the same as they started out.
A physical change might be just as deadly. If the object melted like a chocolate Easter Bunny then the object would be irreversible as well. Take a better example.
Suppose you are talking about a Gold Coin. If you heated it so it melted, the gold would retain its value, but the fact that it is a coin and valuable as such, means that it has lost that part of its value.
I really don't know. My instincts tell me that the chemical change is more dangerous, but I can't rule out the other choice..
<span>The correct answer is D) 12 protons and no electrons. This is correct because the number of protons in the nucleus of the atom is 12. The number of protons in the nucleus represents the atomic number. Therefore if there are 12 protons in the nucleus, the atomic number is 12.</span>
