1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
masya89 [10]
3 years ago
15

What is the binding energy of a mole of nuclei with a mass defect of 0.00084 kg/mol?

Chemistry
2 answers:
Alik [6]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

The binding energy of a mole of the nuclei is 252KJ

Explanation:

The binding energy is the amount of energy required to separate an atom into its nuclei.

From Einstein's relations,

       E = Δmc^{2}

where E is the energy, Δm is the mass defect and c is the speed.

The mole of nuclei moves with the speed of light, so that;

  c = 3.0 × 10^{8} m/s

Given that Δm = 0.00084Kg/mol, the binding energy is calculated as;

       E = 0.00084 × 3.0 × 10^{8}

         = 252000

        = 252KJ

The binding energy of a mole of the nuclei is 252KJ.

Harlamova29_29 [7]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

7.55×10^10 KJmol-1

Explanation:

The actual mass of a nucleus is usually less than the sum of the masses of the constituent neutrons and protons that make up the nucleus. This difference is called the mass defect.

The mass defect is related to the binding energy holding the neutrons and protons together in the nucleus. Since energy and mass are related by Einstein's equation;

E=∆mc^2 where;

E = binding energy of the nucleus

∆m= mass defect of the nucleus

c= speed of light

The larger the mass defect, the larger the binding energy of the nucleus and the more stable the nucleus.

From the data provided;

Mass defect= 0.00084 kg/mol or 0.84g/mol

Since 1 g/mol= 1 amu

0.84g/mol= 0.84 amu

The conversion factor from atomic mass units to MeV is 931

Binding energy = 0.84 × 931= 782.04 MeV

Since 1eV= 96.49KJmol-1

782.04×10^6eV= 7.55×10^10 KJmol-1

You might be interested in
If during an experiment zinc was found to be more reactive than lead or copper, zinc would be considered the strongest _____.
densk [106]

Zinc would be considered the strongest reducing agent.

<h3>Reducing agent</h3>

A reducing agent is a chemical species that "donates" one electron to another chemical species in chemistry (called the oxidizing agent, oxidant, oxidizer, or electron acceptor). Earth metals, formic acid, oxalic acid, and sulfite compounds are a few examples of common reducing agents.

Reducers have excess electrons (i.e., they are already reduced) in their pre-reaction states, whereas oxidizers do not. Usually, a reducing agent is in one of the lowest oxidation states it can be in. The oxidation state of the oxidizer drops while the oxidizer's oxidation state, which measures the amount of electron loss, increases. The agent in a redox process whose oxidation state rises, which "loses/donates electrons," which "oxidizes," and which "reduces" is known as the reducer or reducing agent.

Learn more about reducing agent here:

brainly.com/question/2890416

#SPJ4

<h3 />
5 0
2 years ago
Which is the strongest acid? Ch3ch2ch2chfch2co2h ch3ch2ch2cbr2ch2co2h ch3ch2ch2cf2ch2co2h ch3chbrch2ch2ch2co2h ch2clch2ch2ch2ch2
liq [111]

The strength of an acid increases if the stability of conjugate base increases

The stability of a conjugate base increases with the presence of electron with drawing group (electronegative group)

Thus more the electronegativity of an atom attached to a carboxylic acid higher the strength of acid

In these examples CH3CH2CH2CF2CH2COOH contains to electronegative flourine atoms which stabilizes the conjugate base hence this will be the strongest acid among the given acids

8 0
3 years ago
Hematite is a naturally occurring mineral and a common form of iron ore. The following statements describe physical and chemical
Oksanka [162]
<h2>Answer : Option B) The hematite particles rearrange to form a new substance.</h2><h3>Explanation :</h3>

Hematite particles when gets rearranged to form a new substance,  is an example of a chemical change.

As a chemical changes is usually a change where a substance undergoes a chemical change and forms a new substance; which cannot be easily reversed into reactants by any simple physical methods.

In this example the hematite ore forms a new substance by an irreversible chemical change.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Consider the following system at equilibrium:
Vika [28.1K]

Answer:

1) Rightward shift

2) Rightward shift

3) Leftward shift

4) Leftward shift

5) Leftward shift

6) Rightward shift

7) No shift

8) No shift                                                              

   

Explanation:

To evaluate each case we need to consider Le Chatelier's Principle, which states that the adding of additional reactants or products to a system will shift the equilibrium in the opposite direction, to maintain the equilibrium of the system. On the contrary, if we remove a reactant or a product in the system, the equilibrium will be shifted in the direction of the reactant or product reduced, to produce more of it (and thus maintain balance).        

Taking into account the above, let's see each statement, in the following equation:

A(aq) + B(aq)  ⇄  2C(aq)    (1)

1) Increase A. This will cause a rightward shift in equation 1 in order to consume the reactant added.

2) Increase B. Same as 1), this will cause a rightward in equation 1.

3) Increase C. This will cause a leftward shift in order to consume the excess of product in the system.  

4) Decrease A. This will produce a leftward shift to produce the reactant that is being reduced.

5) Decrease B. Same as 4), a leftward shift.

6) Decrease C. This will produce a rightward shift to produce the product that is being reduced.

7) Double A, half B. The double A will cause a rightward shift and the half B will produce a leftward shift, which results in no shift.

8) Double both B and C. Double B will produce a rightward shift and double C will produce the contrary, a leftward shift, so the final result is no shift.

               

I hope it helps you!

4 0
3 years ago
When might a dominant trait appear?
daser333 [38]

Answer:

A dominant allele will always allow a specific trait to show up no matter if we have two dominant copies (BB) or just one (Bb). A trait from a recessive allele will only appear if it is paired with another recessive allele

Explanation:

(•_•)

<) )╯all the single ladies

/ \

(•_•)

\( (> all the single ladies

/ \

(•_•)

<) )╯oh oh oh

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How does the structure of the stigma aid in pollination?
    10·1 answer
  • An isotope undergoes radioactive decay by emitting radiation that has no mass. What other characteristic does the radiation have
    6·2 answers
  • In certain conditions, the equilibrium concentrations for components in the reaction 2NOCl(g) 2NO(g) + Cl2(g) are [NO] = 0.02 M,
    9·1 answer
  • 37,38<br> asap help show work
    14·1 answer
  • How many Na ions are in 2.7 g of NaCl?<br> Answer in units of ions.
    9·1 answer
  • A gas occupies 900.0 mL at a temperature of 27.0 . What is the volume at 132.0 °C?
    6·1 answer
  • I need some help with my quiz
    15·2 answers
  • 5. How many grams of tin metal can be produced from smelting (heating) of a 4.5 kilograms of tin (IV) oxide? (Note: Elemental ti
    8·2 answers
  • 2. What is some ways composting can help make our food system more sustainable ?
    12·1 answer
  • PLZ HELP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Describe Earth's rotation and revolution . Be sure to include the durations and what they are r
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!