1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
zysi [14]
3 years ago
7

Gayle runs at a speed of 3.85 m/s and dives on a sled, initially at rest on the top of a frictionless snow-covered hill. After s

he has descended a vertical distance of 5.00 m, her brother, who is initially at rest, hops on her back and together they continue down the hill. What is their speed at the bottom of the hill if the total vertical drop is 15.0 m?
Physics
1 answer:
enot [183]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

Final velocity at the bottom of hill is 15.56 m/s.

Explanation:

The given problem can be divided into four parts:

1. Use conservation of momentum to determine the speed of the combined mass (Gayle and sled)

From the law of conservation of momentum (perfectly inelastic collision), the combined velocity is given as:  

p_i = p_f  

m_1u_1 + m_2v_2 = (m_1 + m_2)v

v = \frac{(m_1u_1 + m_2v_2)}{(m_1 + m_2)}

v=\frac{[50.0\ kg)(3.85\ m/s) + 0]}{(50.0\ kg + 5.00\ kg)}= 3.5\ m/s  

2. Use conservation of energy to determine the speed after traveling a vertical height of 5 m.

The velocity of Gayle and sled at the instant her brother jumps on is found from the law of conservation of energy:  

E(i) = E(f)  

KE(i) + PE(i) = KE(f) + PE(f)  

0.5mv^2(i) + mgh(i) = 0.5mv^2(f) + mgh(f)  

v(f) = \sqrt{[v^2(i) + 2g(h(i) - h(f))]}

Here, initial velocity is the final velocity from the first stage. Therefore:  

v(f) = \sqrt{[(3.5)^2+2(9.8)(5.00-0)]}= 10.5\ m/s

3. Use conservation of momentum to find the combined speed of Gayle and her brother.  

Given:

Initial velocity of Gayle and sled is, u_1(i)=10.5 m/s

Initial velocity of her brother is, u_2(i)=0 m/s

Mass of Gayle and sled is, m_1=55.0 kg

Mass of her brother is, m_2=30.0 kg

Final combined velocity is given as:

v(f) = \frac{[m_1u_1(i) + m_2u_2(i)]}{(m_1 + m_2)}  

v(f)=\frac{[(55.0)(10.5) + 0]}{(55.0+30.0)}= 6.79 m/s  

4. Finally, use conservation of energy to determine the final speed at the bottom of the hill.

Using conservation of energy, the final velocity at the bottom of the hill is:  

E(i) = E(f)  

KE(i) + PE(i) = KE(f) + PE(f)  

0.5mv^2(i) + mgh(i) = 0.5mv^2(f) + mgh(f)  

v(f) = \sqrt{[v^2(i) + 2g(h(i) - h(f))]} \\v(f)=\sqrt{[(6.79)^2 + 2(9.8)(15 - 5.00)]}\\v(f)= 15.56\ m/s

You might be interested in
Select all that apply.
Ivanshal [37]
The answer is B and D
5 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Biologists use ball-and-stick models to study complex molecules by representing atoms with balls and bonds with sticks. DNA is a
AleksAgata [21]
One of the major limitations of using the ball and stick model for DNA, is that within a single double stranded segment of DNA, one would have to use many many balls to represent atoms that are present in the sugar phosphate backbone, along with all of the main atoms that compose the nitrogenous bases of DNA, we also cannot construct or show the helical form of DNA, by using balls and sticks as well.
7 0
3 years ago
What is the definition for the term density
horrorfan [7]

Density can be defined as the measure of mass of a substance per unit volume.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
All interactions between the atmosphere and the geosphere involve
son4ous [18]

Answer:

The geosphere consists of the solid Earth and the atmosphere consists of the gaseous components in the air. Thus, the answer is C.

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
How would gravity cause planets to move if they did not have inertia?
daser333 [38]
I’d think the answer would be C. i’m just kinda guessing but my thought process is this (as simply as i can put it because physics is confusing):

so for example say you throw a ball across a flat surface. inertia is what keeps the ball rolling straight in a line, so unless you were to maybe put your hand in front of the ball or something, it would just go straight forever.

this is what happens with the planets. they go in a straight line, but since there’s gravity, the planets are also being pulled towards the sun. so gravity and inertia are why the planets orbit in the circle pattern they do. so when we remove inertia, we’re removing the state in which the planets keep going straight while being pulled towards a center point (the sun). this causes gravity to be the only factor in the planets orbiting. so that being said, the planets would just be pulled towards the sun. :)
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Chef Andy tosses an orange in the air, then catches it again at the same height. The orange is in the air for 0.75\,\text s0.75s
    8·1 answer
  • NEED HELP FAST ILL MARK BRAINLIEST AND RATE 5 STARS AND SAY THANK YOU
    12·2 answers
  • There's my problem PLEASE HELP
    14·2 answers
  • What is the middle layer of earth called
    5·2 answers
  • Which of the following is not considered a major work flow structure?
    8·1 answer
  • A ________ ion is created when an electron is removed.
    12·1 answer
  • 3. A football is kicked with a speed of 35 m/s at an angle of 40°.
    13·1 answer
  • Consider a subsonic engine inlet (i.e., a diffuser) with an inlet area of 1.5 m2 and exit-to-inlet area ratio of 1.44. Air enter
    8·1 answer
  • The distance versus time graph for Object A and Object B are shown.
    8·1 answer
  • Suppose the Sun moved twice the distance from Earth. Describe immediate and future changes to our planet. Justify your reasoning
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!