Answer:
<u>Principal</u><u> </u><u>focus</u><u> </u><u>of</u><u> </u><u>concav</u><u>e</u><u> </u><u>lens</u><u> </u><u>-</u><u> </u>
★ The point at which rays parallel to principal axis coming from infinity appear to converge after being refracted from concave lens is called the principal focus of concave lens.
<em><u>_</u></em><em><u>_</u></em><em><u>_</u></em><em><u>_</u></em><em><u>_</u></em><em><u>_</u></em><em><u>_</u></em><em><u>_</u></em><em><u>_</u></em><em><u>_</u></em><em><u>_</u></em><em><u>_</u></em><em><u>_</u></em><em><u>_</u></em><em><u>_</u></em><em><u>_</u></em><em><u>_</u></em><em><u>_</u></em><em><u>_</u></em><em><u>_</u></em><em><u>_</u></em><em><u>_</u></em><em><u>_</u></em><em><u>_</u></em>
• <u>Additional</u><u> information</u><u> </u><u>-</u><u> </u>
★ Principal focus - A number of rays parallel to the principal axis after reflection from a concave mirror meet at a point on the principal axis or appear to come from a point after reflection from a convex mirror on the principal axis. This is called principal focus.
I believe The snowman should be the answer
The second most common criticism of utilitarianism is that it is impossible to apply - that happiness (etc) cannot be quantified or measured, that there is no way of calculating a trade-off between intensity and extent, or intensity and probability (etc), or comparing happiness to suffering.
The process that powers stars is C)fusion
Explanation:
<em>For</em><em>ce</em><em> </em><em>per</em><em> </em><em>uni</em><em>t</em><em> </em><em>area</em><em> </em><em>is</em><em> </em><em>call</em><em>ed</em><em> </em><em>Pres</em><em>sure</em><em>.</em>
