Answer:
A substance that is composed only of atoms having the same atomic number is ... 36 grams of an unknown liquid at its boiling point,.
1. Always give your graph a title in the following form: "The dependence of (your dependent variable) on (your independent variable). <span><span>Let's say that you're doing a graph where you're studying the effect of temperature on the speed of a reaction. In this reaction, you're changing the temperature to known values, so the temperature is your independent variable. Because you don't know the speed of the reaction and speed depends on the temperature, the speed of the reaction is your dependent variable. As a result, the title of your graph will be "The dependence of reaction rate on temperature", or something like that.</span>
</span>2. The x-axis of a graph is always your independent variable and the y-axis is the dependent variable.<span>For the graph described above, temperature would be on the x-axis (the one on the bottom of the graph), and the reaction rate would be on the y-axis (the one on the side of the graph)
</span>3. Always label the x and y axes and give units.<span>Putting numbers on the x and y-axes is something that everybody always remembers to do (after all, how could you graph without showing the numbers?). However, people frequently forget to put a label on the axis that describes what those numbers are, and even more frequently forget to say what those units are. For example, if you're going to do a chart which uses temperature as the independent variable, you should write the word "temperature (degrees Celsius)" on that axis so people know what those numbers stand for. Otherwise, people won't know that you're talking about temperature, and even if they do, they might think you're talking about degrees Fahrenheit.
</span>4. Always make a line graph<span><span>Never, ever make a bar graph when doing science stuff. Bar graphs are good for subjects where you're trying to break down a topic (such as gross national product) into it's parts. When you're doing graphs in science, line graphs are way more handy, because they tell you how one thing changes under the influence of some other variable. </span>
</span><span>5. Never, EVER, connect the dots on your graph!Hey, if you're working with your little sister on one of those placemats at Denny's, you can connect the dots. When you're working in science, you never, ever connect the dots on a graph.Why? When you do an experiment, you always screw something up. Yeah, you. It's probably not a big mistake, and is frequently not something you have a lot of control over. However, when you do an experiment, many little things go wrong, and these little things add up. As a result, experimental data never makes a nice straight line. Instead, it makes a bunch of dots which kind of wiggle around a graph. This is normal, and will not affect your grade unless your teacher is a Nobel prize winner. However, you can't just pretend that your data is perfect, because it's not. Whenever you have the dots moving around a lot, we say that the data is noisy, because the thing you're looking for has a little bit of interference caused by normal experimental error.</span><span>To show that you're a clever young scientist, your best bet is to show that you KNOW your data is sometimes lousy. You do this by making a line (or curve) which seems to follow the data as well as possible, without actually connecting the dots. Doing this shows the trend that the data suggests, without depending too much on the noise. As long as your line (or curve) does a pretty good job of following the data, you should be A-OK.
</span>6. Make sure your data is graphed as large as possible in the space you've been given.<span><span>Let's face it, you don't like looking at little tiny graphs. Your teacher doesn't either. If you make large graphs, you'll find it's easier to see what you're doing, and your teacher will be lots happier.</span>
</span><span>So, those are the steps you need to follow if you're going to make a good graph in your chemistry class. I've included a couple of examples of good and bad graphs below so you know what these things are supposed to look like.</span>
<u>Answer:</u> The rate law of the reaction is ![\text{Rate}=k[HgCl_2][C_2O_4^{2-}]^2](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Ctext%7BRate%7D%3Dk%5BHgCl_2%5D%5BC_2O_4%5E%7B2-%7D%5D%5E2)
<u>Explanation:</u>
Rate law is defined as the expression which expresses the rate of the reaction in terms of molar concentration of the reactants with each term raised to the power their stoichiometric coefficient of that reactant in the balanced chemical equation.
For the given chemical equation:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4cb61/4cb61a45c72cb1531c8efee1470f20864042d8c3" alt="2 HgCl_2(aq.)+C_2O_4^{2-}(aq.)\rightarrow 2Cl^-(aq.)+2CO_2(g)+Hg_2Cl_2(s)"
Rate law expression for the reaction:
![\text{Rate}=k[HgCl_2]^a[C_2O_4^{2-}]^b](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Ctext%7BRate%7D%3Dk%5BHgCl_2%5D%5Ea%5BC_2O_4%5E%7B2-%7D%5D%5Eb)
where,
a = order with respect to data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b1323/b13231d3f9d9eb588694c389443e31f864a2a3a6" alt="HgCl_2"
b = order with respect to data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d8ba0/d8ba0e5d5c035bd4a4011b87c9998f9ab9a4ae8d" alt="C_2O_4^{2-}"
Expression for rate law for first observation:
....(1)
Expression for rate law for second observation:
....(2)
Expression for rate law for third observation:
....(3)
Expression for rate law for fourth observation:
....(4)
Dividing 2 from 1, we get:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fa7c4/fa7c46077a1bb756c94eca9b22774d5659ac203e" alt="\frac{2.9\times 10^{-4}}{3.2\times 10^{-5}}=\frac{(0.164)^a(0.45)^b}{(0.164)^a(0.15)^b}\\\\9=3^b\\b=2"
Dividing 2 from 3, we get:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/83b4e/83b4e8a1c068d59c994f5592357bbfb591ae2fe2" alt="\frac{2.9\times 10^{-4}}{1.4\times 10^{-4}}=\frac{(0.164)^a(0.45)^b}{(0.082)^a(0.45)^b}\\\\2=2^a\\a=1"
Thus, the rate law becomes:
![\text{Rate}=k[HgCl_2]^1[C_2O_4^{2-}]^2](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Ctext%7BRate%7D%3Dk%5BHgCl_2%5D%5E1%5BC_2O_4%5E%7B2-%7D%5D%5E2)
1) The history of egypt is still unclear; artifacts, how the pyramids were built, gods and whatnot.
2) Egypt's history being uncovered in regards to curses and amulets is still being practiced in the country and some others because of the great influence it had.
3) Egyptians being able to construct such grand structures that still stand (pyramids) serves as evidence that proves Egypt was a very advanced civilization at the peak of their advancement.
Answer:
In the twentieth century, criminologists and forensics strive to summarize the preceding discoveries. In different countries tendencies are beginning to manifest that increase the field of criminological activity in different branches such as criminalistics in Germany; others, penology; and others like the United States, weighed the study as a whole of the science of crime and the science of social reaction provoked by it. In this century, criminology and forensic science had a notable influence on the evolution of criminal law.
Starting in the mid-20th century, a paradigm shift in forensic criminological science was presented, focusing on the study of three aspects: criminal processes, the social environment, and the victim.
Other factors that were taken into account were biosecurity care, which began to have great relevance and greater care since they began to discover infectious diseases transmitted by cadavers to humans.
Approximately in 1939 it was discovered that anthropometric measurements are values that present similarities between different skeleton patterns.
Explanation:
Legal dentistry also addresses the aspect related to “professions” and people's habits, for example, by 1925 it was already possible to identify a smoker by the coloration that the teeth took and the wear on the incisors and canines where the cigar rested. The morphological characteristics of the teeth were, in many cases, used to identify those they called "degenerates", who were the ones who went outside the guidelines of psychic "normality" of the time; among these were prostitutes, thieves, who according to the author had a considerable volume in the molars, the canines were triangular and long, like the upper central incisors that in some reached 8 mm.