bromine
Explanation:
halogens are a group of elemnts simlar to eachother
flourine, chlorine, and bromine
Answer:
the catalyst is the two gray dots
Answer:
8.8g of Al are necessaries
Explanation:
Based on the reaction, 2 moles of Al are required to produce 3 moles of hydrogen gas.
To solve this question we must find the moles of H2 in 11L at STP using PV = nRT. With these moles we can find the moles of Al required and its mass as follows:
<em>Moles H2:</em>
PV = nRT; PV/RT = n
<em>Where P is pressure = 1atm at STP; V is volume = 11L; R is gas constant = 0.082atmL/molK and T is absolute temperature = 273.15K at STP</em>
Replacing:
1atm*11L/0.082atmL/molK*273.15K = n
n = 0.491 moles of H2 must be produced
<em />
<em>Moles Al:</em>
0.491 moles of H2 * (2mol Al / 3mol H2) = 0.327moles of Al are required
<em />
<em>Mass Al -Molar mass: 26.98g/mol-:</em>
0.327moles of Al * (26.98g / mol) = 8.8g of Al are necessaries
Answer:
The condor has a wing span of 10 feet
Explanation:
This can be solved by a simple rule of three
In a rule of three problem, the first step is identifying the measures and how they are related, if their relationship is direct of inverse.
When the relationship between the measures is direct, as the value of one measure increases, the value of the other measure is going to increase too. In this case, the rule of three is a cross multiplication.
When the relationship between the measures is inverse, as the value of one measure increases, the value of the other measure will decrease. In this case, the rule of three is a line multiplication.
In this problem, our measures are the wing span of the condon in meters and the wing span of the condor is feet. As the value of one of these measures increases, the other is going to increase too.
We know that 1m has 3.281 feet,
So we have the following rule of three:
1m - 3.281 feet
3.05m - x feet
x = 3.821*3.05
x = 10 feet
The condor has a wing span of 10 feet
Answer:
Field experiments can often have the potential to give scientists opportunities that are not possible in a lab setting.
Explanation:
Having people "act natural" in a lab setting is impossible to truly achieve, as we all know what happens to our mental state and behavior when we are being actively observed. This is also especially helpful when conducting wildlife research, as there are a myriad of different things influencing animal and plant behavior that would be nigh impossible to recreate perfectly in a controlled lab setting.
Field research can have its disadvantages as well, as it is very hard to only have one thing change (make an independent variable) in a wild environment with ever-changing weather, social effects, etc. Also, you, as the researcher, as causing an impact on the very location that you are observing, which can alter your results in unpredictable ways.
The thing to remember is that each type of study has its advantages and disadvantages; if they didn't, then we'd all do the same type of research! You have to weigh your research options and figure out which one works best for your situation :)
