one of the answers that i found was 5.83 m i did some more research and it showed the same answer again. good luck with it. hope i was able to help you.
Answer:
Option 5. 1 and 3
Solution:
The only forces acting on the tennis ball after it has left contact with the racquet and the instant before it touches the ground are the force of gravity in the downward direction and the force by the air exerted on the ball.
The ball after it left follows the path of trajectory and as it moves forward in the horizontal direction the force of the air acts on it.
In the whole projectile motion of the ball, the acceleration due to gravity acts on the ball thus the force of gravity acts on the ball in the downward direction before it hits the ground.
Answer:
This depends on the writers
if they want they can make spiderman deny the laws of nature
Answer:
the distance from charge A to C is r₁₃= 1.216 m
Explanation:
following Coulomb's law , the force exerted by 2 point charges between themselves is:
F= k*q₁*q₂/r₁₂² , where q is charge , r is distance and 1 and 2 represents the charge A and charge B respectively , k=constant
since C ( denoted as 3) is at equilibrium
F₁₃=F₂₃
k*q₁*q₃/r₁₃²=k*q₂*q₃/r₂₃²
q₁/r₁₃²=q₂/r₂₃²
r₁₃²/q₁=r₂₃²/q₂
r₂₃=r₁₃*√(q₂/q₁)
since C is at rest and is co linear with A and B ( otherwise it would receive a net force in either vertical or horizontal direction) , we have
r₁₃+r₂₃=d=r₁₂
r₁₃+r₁₃*√(q₂/q₁)=d
r₁₃*(1+√(q₂/q₁))=d
r₁₃=d/(1+√(q₂/q₁))
replacing values
r₁₃=d/(1+√(q₂/q₁)) = 3.00 m/(1+√(3.10 C/1.44 C)) = 1.216 m
thus the distance from charge A to C is r₁₃= 1.216 m
Answer:
Explanation:
The moment of inertia is the integral of the product of the squared distance by the mass differential. Is the mass equivalent in the rotational motion
a) True. When the moment of inertia is increased, more force is needed to reach acceleration, so it is more difficult to change the angular velocity that depends proportionally on the acceleration
b) True. The moment of inertia is part of the kinetic energy, which is composed of a linear and an angular part. Therefore, when applying the energy conservation theorem, the potential energy is transformed into kinetic energy, the rotational part increases with the moment of inertia, so there is less energy left for the linear part and consequently it falls slower
c) True. The moment of inertial proportional to the angular acceleration, when the acceleration decreases as well. Therefore, a smaller force can achieve the value of acceleration and the change in angular velocity. Consequently, less force is needed is easier
