Answer:
the equilibrium constant is 1.8 x 10⁻5 and strongly favor the reactants.
Explanation:
the chemical reaction provided for the two equation are the same but different direction i.e a reversible reaction. Assuming, the mass of reactants and product and temperature remain constant.
therefore, the equilibrium constant K, is 1.8 x 10⁻5. this is a very small value of K, thereby strongly favor the backward direction to form reactant.
Answer:
AgNO2
Explanation:
The question asks to know which of these two insoluble salts is expected to be more soluble in acidic solution than in pure water.
To answer this question specifically, we need to know if the anions contained in the insoluble salt is a conjugate of a weak acid or that of a weak base.
Generally, the solubility of insoluble salts that contain anions which are conjugates of weak acids increases in the presence of an acidic solution than in water. While, the solubility of insoluble salts that contain anions which are conjugates of strong acids decreases in the presence of an acidic solution.
Having said this, AgNO2 contains NO2 which is the conjugate base of the Trioxonitrate iii acid which is a weak acid. Hence, it is expected to be stronger in acidic solution than in water.
i think..
potassium hydroxide..
What’s the question sweetheart...?...There’s no question or picture to answer
Answer:
When the results of a new experiment to test atomic theory do not agree with the theory, scientist will repeat the experiment to make sure that his results are reliable.
Explanation:
In the scientific context, each new experiment must be performed with precision and following the steps of the scientific method.
An experiment that does not provide reliable data to demonstrate a theory must be reviewed in detail and performed again to confirm the data obtained in the first attempt.
A theory is a postulate that tries to explain a natural phenomenon, but whose argument can be discussed or does not have the acceptance of a law. When the theory is proven and there are no arguments against it, it can be universally accepted and becomes a law.
The other options are not valid due to:
- <u><em>Scientists worldwide will reject atomic theory because of the new results</em></u><em>. A theory cannot be discarded without solid arguments or evidence in order to dismiss it and establish a new one.</em>
- <u><em>The scientist will change his results to agree with the accepted theory</em></u><em>. This would be an unethical procedure and unacceptable to the scientific community.</em>
- <em><u>Other scientists will reject the results because they do not agree with the theory</u></em><em>. The opinion of other scientists is not enough to dismiss a theory, if it has a valid scientific basis.</em>
