Idk really but i hope you figure out the answer im not on that yet.
The answer is Na < Cl
Chlorine is more electronegative than sodium because this follows the trend of the periodic table. The trend states that an element's electronegativity increases from left to right of a period and bottom to up of a group. Since sodium and chlorine are from the same period, and chlorine is at the right of sodium, chlorine is more electronegative.
<span>All metals have similar properties BUT, there can be wide variations in melting point, boiling point, density, electrical conductivity and physical strength.<span>To explain the physical properties of metals like iron or sodium we need a more sophisticated picture than a simple particle model of atoms all lined up in close packed rows and layers, though this picture is correctly described as another example of a giant lattice held together by metallic bonding.</span><span>A giant metallic lattice – the <span>crystal lattice of metals consists of ions (NOT atoms) </span>surrounded by a 'sea of electrons' that form the giant lattice (2D diagram above right).</span><span>The outer electrons (–) from the original metal atoms are free to move around between the positive metal ions formed (+).</span><span>These 'free' or 'delocalised' electrons from the outer shell of the metal atoms are the 'electronic glue' holding the particles together.</span><span>There is a strong electrical force of attraction between these <span>free electrons </span>(mobile electrons or 'sea' of delocalised electrons)<span> (–)</span> and the 'immobile' positive metal ions (+) that form the giant lattice and this is the metallic bond. The attractive force acts in all directions.</span><span>Metallic bonding is not directional like covalent bonding, it is like ionic bonding in the sense that the force of attraction between the positive metal ions and the mobile electrons acts in every direction about the fixed (immobile) metal ions of the metal crystal lattice, but in ionic lattices none of the ions are mobile. a big difference between a metal bond and an ionic bond.</span><span>Metals can become weakened when repeatedly stressed and strained.<span><span>This can lead to faults developing in the metal structure called 'metal fatigue' or 'stress fractures'.</span><span>If the metal fatigue is significant it can lead to the collapse of a metal structure.</span></span></span></span>
Answer:
km/h
mph
iph
Explanation:
I have no idea what mis or dit could be
km/h is kilometers per hour
mph is miles per hour
I assume iph is inches per hour?
Answer:
![PV_{m} = RT[1 + (b-\frac{a}{RT})\frac{1}{V_{m} } + \frac{b^{2} }{V^{2} _{m} } + ...]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=PV_%7Bm%7D%20%3D%20RT%5B1%20%2B%20%28b-%5Cfrac%7Ba%7D%7BRT%7D%29%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7BV_%7Bm%7D%20%7D%20%2B%20%5Cfrac%7Bb%5E%7B2%7D%20%7D%7BV%5E%7B2%7D%20_%7Bm%7D%20%7D%20%2B%20...%5D)
B = b -a/RT
C = b^2
a = 1.263 atm*L^2/mol^2
b = 0.03464 L/mol
Explanation:
In the given question, we need to express the van der Waals equation of state as a virial expansion in powers of 1/Vm and obtain expressions for B and C in terms of the parameters a and b. Therefore:
Using the van deer Waals equation of state:

With further simplification, we have:
![P = RT[\frac{1}{V_{m}-b } - \frac{a}{RTV_{m} ^{2} }]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=P%20%3D%20RT%5B%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7BV_%7Bm%7D-b%20%7D%20-%20%5Cfrac%7Ba%7D%7BRTV_%7Bm%7D%20%5E%7B2%7D%20%7D%5D)
Then, we have:
![P = \frac{RT}{V_{m} } [\frac{1}{1-\frac{b}{V_{m} } } - \frac{a}{RTV_{m} }]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=P%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7BRT%7D%7BV_%7Bm%7D%20%7D%20%5B%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B1-%5Cfrac%7Bb%7D%7BV_%7Bm%7D%20%7D%20%7D%20-%20%5Cfrac%7Ba%7D%7BRTV_%7Bm%7D%20%7D%5D)
Therefore,
![PV_{m} = RT[(1-\frac{b}{V_{m} }) ^{-1} - \frac{a}{RTV_{m} }]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=PV_%7Bm%7D%20%3D%20RT%5B%281-%5Cfrac%7Bb%7D%7BV_%7Bm%7D%20%7D%29%20%5E%7B-1%7D%20-%20%5Cfrac%7Ba%7D%7BRTV_%7Bm%7D%20%7D%5D)
Using the expansion:

Therefore,
![PV_{m} = RT[1+\frac{b}{V_{m} }+\frac{b^{2} }{V_{m} ^{2} } + ... -\frac{a}{RTV_{m} }]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=PV_%7Bm%7D%20%3D%20RT%5B1%2B%5Cfrac%7Bb%7D%7BV_%7Bm%7D%20%7D%2B%5Cfrac%7Bb%5E%7B2%7D%20%7D%7BV_%7Bm%7D%20%5E%7B2%7D%20%7D%20%2B%20...%20-%5Cfrac%7Ba%7D%7BRTV_%7Bm%7D%20%7D%5D)
Thus:
equation (1)
Using the virial equation of state:
![P = RT[\frac{1}{V_{m} }+ \frac{B}{V_{m} ^{2}}+\frac{C}{V_{m} ^{3} }+ ...]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=P%20%3D%20RT%5B%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7BV_%7Bm%7D%20%7D%2B%20%5Cfrac%7BB%7D%7BV_%7Bm%7D%20%5E%7B2%7D%7D%2B%5Cfrac%7BC%7D%7BV_%7Bm%7D%20%5E%7B3%7D%20%7D%2B%20...%5D)
Thus:
equation (2)
Comparing equations (1) and (2), we have:
B = b -a/RT
C = b^2
Using the measurements on argon gave B = −21.7 cm3 mol−1 and C = 1200 cm6 mol−2 for the virial coefficients at 273 K.
[/tex] = 0.03464 L/mol
a = (b-B)*RT = (34.64+21.7)*(1L/1000cm^3)*(0.0821)*(273) = 1.263 atm*L^2/mol^2