Answer:
a) Mo the electron configuration: 42Mo: 1s2 2s2 2p6 3s2 3p6 4s2 3d10 4p6 5s2 4d4
Mo3+ - is Paramagnetic
b) Au - [Xe] 4f14 5d10 6s1
For Au+ is not paramagnetic
c) Mn - [Ar] 3d5 4s2
Mn2+ is paramagnetic
d)Hf -[Xe] 4f¹⁴ 5d² 6s²
Hf2+ is not paramagnetic
Explanation:
An atom becomes positively charged when it looses an electron.
Diamagnetism in atom occurs whenever two electrons in an orbital paired equalises with a total spin of 0.
Paramagnetism in atom occurs whenever at least one orbital of an atom has a net spin of electron. That is a paramagnetic electron is just an unpaired electron in the atom.
Here is a twist even if an atom have ten diamagnetic electrons, the presence of at least one paramagnetic electron, makes it to be considered as a paramagnetic atom.
Simply put paramagnetic elements are one that have unpaired electrons, whereas diamagnetic elements do have paired electron.
I agree with the statement that the other person has made
Answer:
That it is cooking the food or whatever you have in the pot.
Explanation:
We are learning this in science.
Answer:
the heat of formation of isopropyl alcohol is -317.82 kJ/mol
Explanation:
The heat of combustion of isopropyl alcohol is given as follows;
C₃H₇OH (l) +(9/2)O₂ → 3CO₂(g) + 4H₂O (g)
The heat of combustion of CO₂ and H₂O are given as follows
C (s) + O₂ (g) → CO₂(g) = −393.50 kJ
H₂ (g) + 1/2·O₂(g) → H₂O (l) = −285.83 kJ
Therefore we have
3CO₂(g) + 4H₂O (g) → C₃H₇OH (l) +(9/2)O₂ which we can write as
3C (s) + 3O₂ (g) → 3CO₂(g) = −393.50 kJ × 3 =
4H₂ (g) + 2·O₂(g) → 4H₂O (l) = −285.83 kJ × 4
3CO₂(g) + 4H₂O (g) → C₃H₇OH (l) +(9/2)O₂ = +2006 kJ/mol
-1180.5 - 1143.32 +2006 = -317.82 kJ/mol
Therefore, the heat of formation of isopropyl alcohol = -317.82 kJ/mol.
Answer:
Ca3(PO4)2 and Na
Explanation:
The reaction equation is;
3Ca + 2Na3PO3 -------> Ca3(PO3)2 + 6Na
We must remember that calcium is above sodium in the electrochemical series. This implies that calcium can displace sodium from its solution. Calcium has a reduction potential of -2.87 V while sodium has a reduction potential of -2.71 V. The ion with the more negative reduction potential can easily displace the other in aqueous solution.
This explains why the reaction above is possible.
