All categories

3 years ago

Are there a mole of golf in a 200 g gold necklace

Chemistry

1 answer:

meriva3 years ago

4 0

Explanation:

The answer is 0.5 moles of gold

You might be interested in

Balance this equation. Pb(NO3)2(aq)+NaCl(aq) -> NaNO3(aq)+PbCl2(s)

const2013 [10]

Answer:

Pb(NO3)2(aq) + 2NaCl(aq) -> 2NaNO3(aq)+PbCl2(s)

Explanation:

Pb(NO3)2(aq)+NaCl(aq) -> NaNO3(aq)+PbCl2(s)

This is how it starts out.

Left:

2 NO3s
1 Pb
1 Na
1 Cl

Right

1 Na
1 NO3
1 Pb
2 Cl

So the place to start with this equation is to bring the Cls up to 2

Pb(NO3)2(aq)+2NaCl(aq) -> NaNO3(aq)+PbCl2(s)

But the Nas are now out of kilter.

Pb(NO3)2(aq)+ 2NaCl(aq) -> NaNO3(aq)+PbCl2(s)

Now the right has a problem. There's only 1 Na

Pb(NO3)2(aq) + 2 NaCl(aq) -> 2NaNO3(aq)+PbCl2(s)

Check it out. It looks like we are done.

5 0

3 years ago

David walks 10 Km North. He turns East and walks 10 more Km. What is his distance

BigorU [14]

Answer:

20 km

Explanation:

he walks 10 km + another 10 km so 20 :)

3 0

3 years ago

Animals inherit traits from their parents. They pass some of these same traits on to their children. Suppose a pair of animals h

Fantom [35]

Answer:

A. The children will be more likely to survive than if they did not have the trait.

Explanation:

Process of elimination

B. It will not affect the children.

Cannot be true, if it didn't impact the children then how would survival of the fittest work?

D. The children will be able to adapt if the environment changes.

That just... not how adapting works when it comes to evolution.

C. The children will be more likely to survive than their parents were

Everyone has the same trait, everyone is equal in that regard.

A. The children will be more likely to survive than if they did not have the trait.

"Suppose a pair of animals has a trait that helps them survive in their environment." The trait helps them survive. Not having the trait makes them less likely to survive. A is correct

8 0

2 years ago

State which of the following set of quantum number would be possible and which would be permissible for an electron in an atom.

raketka [301]

Answer:

The correct option is: e) n=4, l=3, $m_{l}$ = - 2 , $m_{s}$ = - 1/2

Explanation:

The four quantum numbers that describe the electrons in an atom are: The principal: n, azimuthal: l, magnetic: m, and spin: s.

For a given electron, the values of the quantum numbers should be in the given range- principal quantum number: n ≥ 1;

azimuthal quantum number: 0 ≤ l ≤ n − 1;

magnetic quantum number: −l ≤ $m_{l}$ ≤ +l;

spin quantum number: −s ≤ $m_{s}$ ≤ +s

Now, for n= 4,

The value of l: 0 to n − 1 = 0 to 3 = 0, 1, 2, 3

The value of $m_{l}$ for l= 3 : -3 to +3 = -3, -2, -1, 0, +1, +2, +3

The value of $m_{s}$ : -1/2, +1/2

Therefore, the given set of quantum numbers: n=4, l=3, $m_{l}$ = - 2 , $m_{s}$ = - 1/2; are possible and permissible for an electron in an atom.

5 0

3 years ago

Please help

Alika [10]

Answer:

there is no question to answer :(

4 0

2 years ago