Hope this helps, have a nice day!
It's lone a little distinction (103 degrees versus 104 degrees in water), and I trust the standard rationalization is that since F is more electronegative than H, the electrons in the O-F bond invest more energy far from the O (and near the F) than the electrons in the O-H bond. That moves the powerful focal point of the unpleasant constrain between the bonding sets far from the O, and thus far from each other. So the shock between the bonding sets is marginally less, while the repugnance between the solitary matches on the O is the same - the outcome is the edge between the bonds is somewhat less.
burninh fossil fuels is not an example
Answer:
I cant see the whole question but to my knowledge it is the 3rd law
Explanation:
because the third law states what the applied force is when two objects interact
Answer:
Explanation:
Physical change is a temporary and reversible change in which the physical properties of the substance changes without altering the composition of the substance Eg Melting of ice while chemical change is a permanent and not so easily reversible change in which the identity of the substance is altered to produce one or more substances Eg Combustion
