Answer:
Negligible
Explanation:
According to the kinetic theory of gases, the degree of intermolecular interaction between gases is minimal and gas molecules tend to spread out and fill up the volume of the container.
If the attraction between gas molecules increases, then the volume of the gas decreases accordingly. This is because, gas molecules become highly attracted to each other.
This intermolecular attractive force may be so strong, such that the actual volume of the gas become negligible compared to the volume of the container.
I'm guessing the photo means photosynthesis. In that case, it is solar energy to chemical energy. Radiant energy and solar energy is kind of the same thing, so 4th answer.
Mn+2 is cation and CO3 is anion
hope it help
Answer:125.84g
Explanation:Sucrose is dissacharides an organic compound in the class of carbonhydrate with the chemical formula C11H22O11.molar concentration is given by number of moles/Volume,this implies that moles=molar concentration ×Volume=0.130M×2.75L=0.3575moles.
Furthermore,number of moles=Mass of Sucrose/molecular Mass of Sucrose.
From it's formular C11H22O11, molecular Mass is the addition of the mass number which is 12 for C,2 for H and 16 for oxygen,O.so molecular Mass of Sucrose is (12×11)+(2×22)+(16×11)=352.
So mass =moles ×molecular mass=0.3575moles×352g/moles=125.84g
Answer:- 3. 
and 
Explanations:- An empirical formula is the simplest whole number ratio of atoms of each element present in the molecule/compound.
For example, the molecular formula of benzene is 
. The ratio of C to H in it is 6:6 that could be simplified to 1:1. So, an empirical formula of benzene is CH.
In the first pair, the ratio of C to H in first molecule is 2:4 that could be simplified to 1:2 and the empirical formula is 
. In second molecule the ratio of C to H is 6:6 and it could be simplified to 1:1. and the empirical formula is CH. Empirical formulas are different for both the molecules of first pair and so it is not the right choice.
In second pair, C to H ratio in first molecule is 1:2, so the empirical formula is . The C to H ratio for second molecule is 1:4, so the empirical formula is 
. Here also, the empirical formulas are not same and hence it is also not the right choice.
In third pair, C to H ratio in first molecule is 1:3, so the empirical formula is . In second molecule the C to H ratio is 2:6 and it is simplified to 1:3. So, the empirical formula for this one is also . Hence. this is the correct choice.
In fourth pair, first molecule empirical formula is CH. Second molecule has 2:4 that is 1:2 mole ratio of C to H and so its empirical formula is . As the empirical formulas are different, it is not the right choice.
So, the only and only correct pair is the third one. 3. and
