You should trust the primary source more.
This is because the primary source is make its conclusion from direct observation, while the secondary source is possibly making reference to another secondary source or to another primary.
The primary source should be trusted more because it is from direct observation.
Answer:
A. Is the one that the experimenter manipulates directly
Explanation:
The independent variable is the one that is manipulated during an experiment by the experimenter.
The dependent variable is the one that is effected by the independent variable in an experiment.
Technically it's a chemical change even though the process is reversible.
Answer:
Thus, if field were sampled at same distance, the field due to short wire is greater than field due to long wire.
Explanation:
The magnetic field, B of long straight wire can be obtained by applying ampere's law

I is here current, and r's the distance from the wire to the field of measurement.
The magnetic field is obviously directly proportional to the current wire. From this expression.
As the resistance of the long cable is proportional to the cable length, the short cable becomes less resilient than the long cable, so going through the short cable (where filled with the same material) is a bigger amount of currents. If the field is measured at the same time, the field is therefore larger than the long wire because of the short wire.
<span>The question says: complete the sentence: The distance between stars is typically measured in.... The answer is 'light years" - the distance that light travels in a year. That's because it's a very big unit and if we were using smaller units, we would be using huge numbers that would be hard to read and would take up a lot of space.</span>