Most likely in a shallow sea environment.
Answer:
Explanation:
A lot of physicist and many cosmologist believe by their research works on quantum fluctuation that it is possible for the universe to be created out of nothing. They believe and has almost proved that particle comes in and out of existence from empty space. This idea led them believe that big bang singularity also came out of nothing (hyperspace) by quantum fluctuation creating positive and negative energy of equal amount. Thus conserving law of energy. In this scenario, positive energy is matter and negative energy is gravity so total energy of universe/big bang singularity is zero. Therefore, it is plausible for our universe to come out of nothing on its own. But why universe came into existence it's own confirming the idea of 'why there is something rather than nothing' as Lawrence Maxwell Krauss hypothesized could be correct.
it is an example of kinetic energy
so the answer is b kinetic energy
Answer:
A star that always remains above your horizon and appears to rotate around the celestial pole.
Explanation:
A) a star that is close to the north celestial pole: a circumpolar star could be close to the north celestial pole, but this answer is omitting the south celestial pole.
B) a star that is close to the south celestial pole: a circumpolar star could be close to the south celestial pole, but this answer is omitting the north celestial pole.
C) a star that always remains above your horizon and appears to rotate around the celestial pole: this is the definition of a circumpolar star.
D) a star that makes a daily circle around the celestial sphere: every star does this.
E) a star that is visible from the Arctic or Antarctic circles
: there are many starts visible from there that are not circumpolar.
Using the formula t=root of 2h/g then where h=28 and g=9.8 then substitute so the answer is 2.4seconds