1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
stiv31 [10]
4 years ago
11

Two points in a plane have polar coordinates (3.00 m, 20.0°) and (3.50 m, 140.0°). (a) Determine the Cartesian coordinates of th

ese points. (3.00 m, 20.0°) x = m y = m (3.50 m, 140.0°) x = m y = m (b) Determine the distance between them.
Physics
2 answers:
Softa [21]4 years ago
6 0

Answer:

a)(2.82, 1.03) and (-2.68, 2.25)

b) 5.63 m

Explanation:

a) The Cartesian coordinates of point (3.00 m, 20.0°) is

(3cos20.0°, 3sin20.0°) = (2.82, 1.03) m

The Cartesian coordinates of point (3.5 m, 140.0°) is

(3.5cos140.0°, 3.5sin140.0°) = (-2.68, 2.25) m

b) The distance between them

d = \sqrt{(2.82 - (-2.68))^2 + (1.03 - 2.25)^2} = \sqrt{5.5^2 + 1.22^2} = 5.63m

Gekata [30.6K]4 years ago
3 0
<h2>Answer:</h2>

(a) Cartesian coordinate (2.8191m, 1.0260m) and (-2.6810m, 2.2498m)

(b) distance = 5.6346m

<h2>Explanation:</h2>

Given a polar coordinate (r, θ);

Its Cartesian coordinate is (x, y) where;

x = r cos θ

y = r sin θ

Now, given the polar coordinate (3.00, 20.0⁰)

Its Cartesian coordinate is (x, y) where

x = 3.00 cos 20.0° = 3.00 x 0.9397 = 2.8191m

y = 3.00 sin 20.0° = 3.00 x 0.3420 = 1.0260m

Therefore,

Polar coordinate (3.00m, 20.0°) = Cartesian coordinate (2.8191m, 1.0260m)

Also,

Now, given the polar coordinate (3.50, 140.0⁰)

Its Cartesian coordinate is (x, y) where

x = 3.50 cos 140.0° = 3.50 x -0.7660 = -2.6810m

y = 3.40 sin 140.0° = 3.50 x 0.6428 = 2.2498m

Therefore,

Polar coordinate (3.50m, 140.0°) = Cartesian coordinate (-2.6810m, 2.2498m)

(a) Polar coordinates (3.00m, 20.0°) and (3.50m, 140.0°) = Cartesian coordinate (2.8191m, 1.0260m) and (-2.6810m, 2.2498m)

(b) To calculate the distance between them, it is easier to use the values from the Cartesian representation as follows;

distance = \sqrt{(x_{2} - x_{1})^{2}  + (y_{2} - y_{1})^{2} }

where;

(x_{1}, y_{1}) = (2.8191m, 1.0260m) and

(x_{2}, y_{2}) = (-2.6810m, 2.2498m)

=> distance = \sqrt{(-2.6810 - 2.8191)^{2} + (2.2498 - 1.0260)^{2} }

=> distance = \sqrt{(-5.5001)^{2} + (1.2238)^{2} }

=> distance = \sqrt{30.2511+1.4977}

=> distance = \sqrt{31.7488}

=> distance = 5.6346m

You might be interested in
A girl is standing still in the middle of a baseball field. The girl catches the baseball and begins to move in the same directi
MrRa [10]
Inelastic, because the ball 'glued' to the girl, so she has the same quantity of movement as the ball
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The most useful unit of measurement for measuring the thickness of a side of a lab beaker would be a(n)
andrew11 [14]
The answer is letter c

3 0
3 years ago
What is the potential energy of a 2,000-kg car parked at the top of a 30-m hill?
babymother [125]
Potential energy is a relative measure, so the answer is dependent on the assumptions we make. The potential energy in the car is going to be gravitational potential energy(PE). PE = mgh, where m is the mass, g is 9.8 m/s^2, and h is the height. So PE = 2000*9.8*h = 19600h. The final answer obviously depends on h. Most likely the problem is assuming that 30 meters under the top of the hill is considered 0 meters. Then h would be 30m and PE would equal 588 kJ.
5 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Ted lifts a 10N weight at a height of 1.5 m in 1
masha68 [24]

Answer:

D. Ted expanded more power.

Explanation:

Given the following data;

For Ted.

Force = 10N

Height = 1.5m

Time = 1 seconds

To find Ted's power;

Power = workdone/time

But workdone = force * distance

Workdone = 10 * 1.5

Workdone = 15 Nm

Power = 15/1

Power = 15 Watts.

For Johnny.

Force = 10N

Height = 1.5m

Time = 2 seconds

To find Ted's power;

Power = workdone/time

But workdone = force * distance

Workdone = 10 * 1.5

Workdone = 15 Nm

Power = 15/2

Power = 7.5 Watts

Therefore, from the calculations we can deduce and conclude that Ted expanded more power.

5 0
3 years ago
How does the acceleration due to gravity relate to the mass of an object and the distance from Earth?
Irina18 [472]
The object's mass is irrelevant.
The acceleration due to Earth's gravity is inversely proportional to the square of the object's distance from the center of the Earth.
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The posted speed limit on the road heading from your house to school is45 mi/h, which is about 20 m/s. If you live 8 km (8,000 m
    15·2 answers
  • You made a peanut butter and jelly sandwich for lunch and ate it. What did your actions cause?
    12·2 answers
  • If you dip your finger repeatedly into a surface of still water, you create waves. If you dip your finger at a lower rate, the h
    13·1 answer
  • What is the angular speed in rad/s of the second hand of a watch?
    5·1 answer
  • ) A satellite of mass m has an orbital period T when it is in a circular orbit of radius R around the earth. If the satellite in
    15·1 answer
  • An outdoor Wi-Fi unit for a picnic area has a 110 mW output and a range of about 38 m. What output power (in mW) would reduce it
    12·1 answer
  • Do all objects have inertia <br><br> a) true<br> b) false
    10·1 answer
  • I need hat does the slope of a line on this graph represent?
    10·1 answer
  • What is the mass of 32.5 cm^3 of alcohol?
    13·1 answer
  • Help 100 points will give brainleyest
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!