Answer:
Acceleration, 
Explanation:
It is given that,
Separation between the protons, 
Charge on protons, 
Mass of protons, 
We need to find the acceleration of two isolated protons. It can be calculated by equating electric force between protons and force due to motion as :
So, the acceleration of two isolated protons is 
. Hence, this is the required solution.
Answer:
y=8
Explanation:
every time you multiply x by 3 you divide y by 3.
x=2, multiply it by 3: x=6
y=24, divide it by 3: y=8
Answer:
Momentum, p = 5 kg-m/s
Explanation:
The magnitude of the momentum of an object is the product of its mass m and speed v i.e.
p = m v
Mass, m = 3 kg
Velocity, v = 1.5 m/s
So, momentum of this object is given by :
p = 4.5 kg-m/s
or
p = 5 kg-m/s
So, the magnitude of momentum is 5 kg-m/s. Hence, this is the required solution.
Answer: hope it helps you...❤❤❤❤
Explanation: If your values have dimensions like time, length, temperature, etc, then if the dimensions are not the same then the values are not the same. So a “dimensionally wrong equation” is always false and cannot represent a correct physical relation.
No, not necessarily.
For instance, Newton’s 2nd law is F=p˙ , or the sum of the applied forces on a body is equal to its time rate of change of its momentum. This is dimensionally correct, and a correct physical relation. It’s fine.
But take a look at this (incorrect) equation for the force of gravity:
F=−G(m+M)Mm√|r|3r
It has all the nice properties you’d expect: It’s dimensionally correct (assuming the standard traditional value for G ), it’s attractive, it’s symmetric in the masses, it’s inverse-square, etc. But it doesn’t correspond to a real, physical force.
It’s a counter-example to the claim that a dimensionally correct equation is necessarily a correct physical relation.
A simpler counter example is 1=2 . It is stating the equality of two dimensionless numbers. It is trivially dimensionally correct. But it is false.
Answer:
its tension force which acts in a string
Explanation:
need a thanks and thats it
