Answer: 0m/s²
Explanation:
Since the forces acting along the plane are frictional force(Ff) and moving force(Fm), we will take the sum of the forces along the plane
According newton's law of motion
Summation of forces along the plane = mass × acceleration
Frictional force is always acting upwards the plane since the body will always tends to slide downwards on an inclined plane and the moving acts down the plane
Ff = nR where
n is coefficient of friction = tan(theta)
R is normal reaction = Wcos(theta)
Fm = Wsin(theta)
Substituting in the formula of newton's first law we have;
Fm-Ff = ma
Wsin(theta) - nR = ma
Wsin(theta) - n(Wcos(theta)) = ma... 1
Given
W = 562N, theta = 30°, n = tan30°, m = 56.2kg
Substituting in eqn 1,
562sin30° - tan30°(562cos30°) = 56.2a
281 - 281 = 56.2a
0 = 56.2a
a = 0m/s²
This shows that the trunk is not accelerating
Number of rulings per centimeter for the grating 4.5 x 10^3 grooves/cm
Given:
wavelength of light = 635.00 nm
angle of first order = 38.0∘
To Find:
Length of slits marked on grafting
Solution: Grafting and budding are horticultural techniques used to join parts from two or more plants so that they appear to grow as a single plant
We use the grating equation dsinθ = mλ
d = mλ/sinθ
d = 1 x 635x10^-7 m/sin 38.0∘
d = 2189.6 x 10^-7 m
Thus the grating gauge is
1/d = 0.00045 x 10^7 = 4.5 x 10^3 grooves/cm
So, number of rulings per centimeter for the grating 4.5 x 10^3 grooves/cm
Learn more about Wavelength here:
brainly.com/question/9807579
#SPJ4
<h2>About 1 billion trillion stars</h2>
Since the universe is so big, we don't know for sure what the exact number is, but assuming an average of 100 billion stars per galaxy (which is smaller than a universe), we could say that there are 1 billion trillion stars in the observable universe.
Answer:
Explained
Explanation:
The aperture is the place through which all the light enter into the telescope.
when the aperture is bigger more light coming from outside enter the telescope, hence a bigger and clearer image is seen. That is why scientists say the bigger the better.
Moreover, the resolution of the telescope is inversely proportional to the diameter of the aperture.
