If dirt and grease were good conductors of electrical current, then we could make wire
out of dirt and grease instead of expensive copper. Sadly, they're not. So a coating of
dirt and grease on the wire can have a substantial impact on the connection, and can
even block the flow of current across the connection completely. Moreover, in the case
where the ends of the wires are to be soldered, solder does not adhere to dirty wire.
A property of cells, tissues, and organisms that allows the maintenance and regulation of the stability and constancy needed to function properly. Homeostasis is a healthy state that is maintained by the constant adjustment of biochemical and physiological pathways.
have a good day :).
A is pulling the block straight down toward the center of the Earth, no matter what the slope of the plane may be. A is the force of gravity.
The directions of B and C both depend on the slope of the plane.
B is a force that's parallel to the plane, pulling the block UP the plane. B is the force of friction.
C is a force perpendicular to the plane, preventing the block from falling down through the plane. C is the normal force.
Answer:
θ = 36.2º
Explanation:
When light passes through a polarizer it becomes polarized and if it then passes through a second polarizer, it must comply with Malus's law
I = I₀ cos² tea
The non-polarized light between the first polarized of this leaves half the intensity, with vertical polarization
I₁ = I₀ / 2
I₁ = 845/2
I₁ = 422.5 W / m²
In this case, the incident light in the second polarizer has an intensity of I₁ = 422.5 W / m² and the light that passes through the polarizer has a value of
I = 275 W / m
²
Cos² θ = I / I₁
Cos θ = √ I / I₁
Cos θ = √ (275 / 422.5)
Cos θ = 0.80678
θ = cos⁻¹ 0.80678
θ = 36.2º
This is the angle between the two polarizers
Answer:
Explanation:
The moment of inertia is the integral of the product of the squared distance by the mass differential. Is the mass equivalent in the rotational motion
a) True. When the moment of inertia is increased, more force is needed to reach acceleration, so it is more difficult to change the angular velocity that depends proportionally on the acceleration
b) True. The moment of inertia is part of the kinetic energy, which is composed of a linear and an angular part. Therefore, when applying the energy conservation theorem, the potential energy is transformed into kinetic energy, the rotational part increases with the moment of inertia, so there is less energy left for the linear part and consequently it falls slower
c) True. The moment of inertial proportional to the angular acceleration, when the acceleration decreases as well. Therefore, a smaller force can achieve the value of acceleration and the change in angular velocity. Consequently, less force is needed is easier
