All categories

3 years ago

Select all (there's more than one) of the below chemicals that would be insoluble in water.

Chemistry

1 answer:

Helen [10]3 years ago

5 0

FeCO₃ and PbCrO₄ is insoluble in water.

<u>Explanation:</u>

If any substance added to water and it form ions then it is soluble in water otherwise it is insoluble in water.

a. NH₄OH - soluble in water

b. NaNO₃ - soluble in water

C. PbCrO₄ is insoluble in water

d. SrSO₄ slightly soluble in water

e. K₃PO₄ - Soluble in water

f. AgClO₄- Highly Soluble in water

g. HgCl₂ - Slightly soluble in water

h. FeCO₃ - insoluble in water

i. NH₄Br - soluble in water

j. Li₂Cr₂O₇ - soluble in water

You might be interested in

A piece of copper alloy with a mass of 85.0 g is heated from 30. °C to 45 °C. In the process, it absorbs 523 J of energy as heat

Ne4ueva [31]

Answer:

410.196 J/[kg*°C].

Explanation:

1) the equation of the energy is: E=c*m*(t₂-t₁), where E - energy (523 J), c - unknown specific heat of copper, m - mass of this copper [kg], t₂ - the final temperature, t₁ - initial temerature;

2) the specific heat of copper is:

$c=\frac{E}{m*(t_2-t_1)}; \ => \ c=\frac{523}{0.085*(45-30)}=\frac{523}{1.275}=410.196[\frac{J}{kg*C}].$

6 0

3 years ago

How many moles of water are formed when 22 mol of methane combusts?

icang [17]

Methane is a hydrocarbon which when burns in air (combustion) produces carbon dioxide and water. The equation for the reaction;
CH4 +2O2 = CO2 +2H2O
When one mole of methane combusts 2 moles of water are formed
Therefore; when 22 moles of methane combusts 44 moles of water are formed (22 ×2)

7 0

3 years ago

Question 1 (1 point)<br> ROOTS--What is NOT a root function in plants?

Jlenok [28]

Answer:

deez nuets

Explanation:

bf gm Jr rj if dl if did fll j fll kd golf du is no u to

3 0

3 years ago

You have been shipwrecked on a deserted island with no running water/fresh water, you have your clothes and a plastic bag contai

artcher [175]

Answer:

i have no clue

Explanation:

6 0

2 years ago

Which of dalton's postulates about atoms are inconsistent with later observations? do these inconsistencies mean that dalton was

Neporo4naja [7]

1) Dalton stated that atom is matter that can not be divided, but it is proved that the atom can be divided into subatomic particles (electrons, protons and neutrons).

2) He stated that atoms of one element can not be changed into atoms of other elements, but now that is possible by nuclear reactions.

Today we still use his postulate: Atoms combine in the ratio of small whole numbers to form stable compounds, for example H₂O.

6 0

3 years ago