Answer:
The person is 187[m] farther and 70° south to east.
Explanation:
We can solve this problem by drawing a sketch of the location of the person and the truck, then we will draw the displacement vectors and finally the length of the vector and the direction of the vector will be measured in order to give the correct indication of where the person will have to move.
First we establish an origin of a coordinate system.
We can see in the attached schema that the red vector is the displacement vector from the last point to where the truck is located.
The length of the vector is 187 [m], and the direction is 70 degrees south to East.
The focal length of given concave lens will be -26.85 cm
The height of an image to the height of an object is the ratio that is used to determine a lens' magnification. Additionally, it is provided in terms of object and image distance. It is equivalent to the object distance to image distance ratio.
Given concave lens creates a virtual image at -47.0 cm and a magnification of +1.75.
We have to find focal length
The focal length can be found out by following way:
Magnification = m = +1.75
m = hi/h
hi = -47 cm
1.75 = -47/h
h = -26.85 cm
So the focal length of given concave lens will be -26.85 cm
Learn more about magnification factor here:
brainly.com/question/6947486
#SPJ10
The universal law of gravitation states that:
Every object in the universe attracts every other object with a force which is proportional to the product of their masses and inversely proportional to the square of distance between them.
It means that if the gravitational force is F, then if the distance is decreased by 5 times, then the new gravitation force is:
F/5² = F/25
red goes to red, black goes to white, yellow goes to green, blue goes to blue.
Answer:
b
Explanation:
Brownian motion is the random movement of particles in a fluid due to their collisions with other atoms or molecules. ... Brownian motion takes its name from the Scottish botanist Robert Brown, who observed pollen grains moving randomly in water. He described the motion in 1827 but was unable to explain it.
