Answer:
(a). The eye's near point is 68.98 cm from the eye.
(b). The eye's far point is 33.33 cm from the eye.
Explanation:
Given that,
Power = 2.55 D
Object distance = 25 cm for near point
Object distance = ∞ for far point
Suppose where is the far point of an eye for which a contact lens with a power of -3.00 D is prescribed for distant vision?
(a) We need to calculate the focal length
Using formula of power

Put the value into the formula

We need to calculate the image distance
Using formula of lens

Put the value into the formula




The eye's near point is 68.98 cm from the eye.
(b). We need to calculate the focal length
Using formula of power

Put the value into the formula

We need to calculate the image distance
Using formula of lens

Put the value into the formula




The eye's far point is 33.33 cm from the eye.
Hence, (a). The eye's near point is 68.98 cm from the eye.
(b). The eye's far point is 33.33 cm from the eye.
Answer:
1. Either larger or smaller than the displacement of either wave acting alone, depending on the signs of the displacements of the two waves.
Answer:
The resultant velocity is <u>169.71 km/h at angle of 45° measured clockwise with the x-axis</u> or the east-west line.
Explanation:
Considering west direction along negative x-axis and north direction along positive y-axis
Given:
The car travels at a speed of 120 km/h in the west direction.
The car then travels at the same speed in the north direction.
Now, considering the given directions, the velocities are given as:
Velocity in west direction is, 
Velocity in north direction is, 
Now, since
are perpendicular to each other, their resultant magnitude is given as:

Plug in the given values and solve for the magnitude of the resultant.This gives,

Let the angle made by the resultant be 'x' degree with the east-west line or the x-axis.
So, the direction is given as:

Therefore, the resultant velocity is 169.71 km/h at angle of 45° measured clockwise with the x-axis or the east-west line.
If both bars are made of a good conductor, then their specific heat capacities must be different. If both are metals, specific heat capacities of different metals can vary by quite a bit, eg, both are in kJ/kgK, Potassium is 0.13, and Lithium is very high at 3.57 - both of these are quite good conductors.
If one of the bars is a good conductor and the other is a good insulator, then, after the surface application of heat, the temperatures at the surfaces are almost bound to be different. This is because the heat will be rapidly conducted into the body of the conducting bar, soon achieving a constant temperature throughout the bar. Whereas, with the insulator, the heat will tend to stay where it's put, heating the bar considerably over that area. As the heat slowly conducts into the bar, it will also start to cool from its surface, because it's so hot, and even if it has the same heat capacity as the other bar, which might be possible, it will eventually reach a lower, steady temperature throughout.