1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Wewaii [24]
3 years ago
7

Oppositely charged objects attract each other. This attraction holds electrons in atoms and holds atoms to one another in many c

ompounds. However, Ernest Rutherford’s model of the atom failed to explain why electrons were not pulled into the atomic nucleus by this attraction. What change to the atomic model helped solve the problem seen in Rutherford’s model?
Physics
2 answers:
GalinKa [24]3 years ago
6 0

Answer and Explanation:

This can be explained as in Rutherford's model of atom the electrons orbits the nucleus which means that they will travel around the nucleus with some velocity and hence radiate electromagnetic waves which results in the loss of energy due to which the electron keeps coming closer and eventually falls into the nucleus.

But Bohr came up with a better explanation as according to the Bohr's atomic model, electrons stay fixed in orbit with certain energy in different shells around the nucleus and can only jump from an energy level to another if that specific amount of energy is supplied to it.

This model is based on the quantization of energy thus giving an explanation why electrons do not fall into the nucleus of an atom.

strojnjashka [21]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

A) Bohr’s work with atomic spectra led him to say that the electrons were limited to existing in certain energy levels, like standing on the rungs of a ladder.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
____________ is the activity performed prior to participating in an activity.
disa [49]
I think its B but it could also be D because usually they say line up and than u do the activity or strech so..



Plz mark as brainlist hope i helped
8 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A mercury manometer is connected on one side to a bulb containing argon, while the other end is open to atmospheric pressure, wh
belka [17]

Answer:

740, mm of Hg

Explanation:

The pressure of argon , in mm of Hg = difference in the level of mercury on either side of the manometer.

mercury column  in the open end of the manometer is 22 mm below that in the side connected to the argon and 762 mmHg,  end is open to atmospheric pressure.

therefore, The pressure of argon , in mm of Hg  =762 -22 = 740, mm of Hg

4 0
3 years ago
Calculate the energy, wavelength, and frequency of the emitted photon when an electron moves from an energy level of -3.40 eV to
jasenka [17]

Answer:

(a) The energy of the photon is 1.632 x 10^{-8} J.

(b) The wavelength of the photon is 1.2 x 10^{-17} m.

(c) The frequency of the photon is 2.47 x 10^{25} Hz.

Explanation:

Let;

E_{1} = -13.60 ev

E_{2} = -3.40 ev

(a) Energy of the emitted photon can be determined as;

E_{2} - E_{1} = -3.40 - (-13.60)

           = -3.40 + 13.60

           = 10.20 eV

           = 10.20(1.6 x 10^{-9})

E_{2} - E_{1} = 1.632 x 10^{-8} Joules

The energy of the emitted photon is 10.20 eV (or 1.632 x 10^{-8} Joules).

(b) The wavelength, λ, can be determined as;

E = (hc)/ λ

where: E is the energy of the photon, h is the Planck's constant (6.6 x 10^{-34} Js), c is the speed of light (3 x 10^{8} m/s) and λ is the wavelength.

10.20(1.6 x 10^{-9}) = (6.6 x 10^{-34} * 3 x 10^{8})/ λ

λ = \frac{1.98*10^{-25} }{1.632*10^{-8} }

  = 1.213 x 10^{-17}

Wavelength of the photon is 1.2 x 10^{-17} m.

(c) The frequency can be determined by;

E = hf

where f is the frequency of the photon.

1.632 x 10^{-8}  = 6.6 x 10^{-34} x f

f = \frac{1.632*10^{-8} }{6.6*10^{-34} }

 = 2.47 x 10^{25} Hz

Frequency of the emitted photon is 2.47 x 10^{25} Hz.

6 0
3 years ago
What factor might be contributing to climate change
kirza4 [7]

Geological records stretching back millions of years indicate a number of large variations in Earth’s past climate. These have been caused by many natural factors, including changes in the sun, volcanoes, Earth’s orbit and CO2 levels.

However, comprehensive assessment by scientists shows that it is extremely likely that human activity has been the dominant cause of warming since the mid-20th Century.

6 0
4 years ago
PLEASE HELP
Rzqust [24]
Race relations throughout history has changed over and over. But as far as the modern world race relations have went through all three. Diversity is far more common now ( which I think is positive) .
7 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • A 2.00x10^6 hertz radio signal is sent a distance of 7.30x10^10 meters from earth to a spaceship orbiting Mars. How much time do
    7·1 answer
  • Please help asap I need this rn
    10·1 answer
  • How does a pie chart help form conclusions?
    15·1 answer
  • A solid ball of radius rb has a uniform charge density ρ.
    6·1 answer
  • A cue ball with mass 170g hits a stationary number 8 ball, which has mass 160g. The cue ball
    11·1 answer
  • Violet light (410 nm) and red light (685 nm) pass through a diffraction grating with d = 3.33 x 10-6 m. What is the angular sepa
    13·1 answer
  • A planet of mass m moves around the Sun of mass M in an elliptical orbit. The maximum and minimum distance of the planet from th
    11·1 answer
  • A child wants to throw a rock upward to try to strike a plump apple up in a
    13·1 answer
  • What are the SI units of thermal conductivity?​
    5·1 answer
  • 6X-6=9<br><br> Solve for X<br><br> Round to TWO decimal places
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!