The wavelengths of radio waves are much _______________ than the wavelength of microwaves. therefore, radio waves carry much ___
2 answers:
Answer:
The wavelengths of radio waves are much longer than the wavelength of microwaves. therefore, radio waves carry much lower energy than a microwave.
Explanation:
The wavelength of radio waves is longer than the wavelength of microwaves.
Using the equation that relates energy and wavelength:
where h and c are constants (h is Planck's constant and c the constant of the velocity of light)
And is the wavelength.
What this equation tells us is that the energy is inversely proportional to the wavelength. The larger the wavelength, the lower the energy that the wave carries.
So, since the wavelength of radio waves is much longer, its energy is much lower than the energy of microwaves.
You might be interested in
Hi there!
We can use Biot-Savart's Law for a moving particle:
B = Magnetic field strength (T)
v = velocity of electron (0.130c = 3.9 × 10⁷ m/s)
q = charge of particle (1.6 × 10⁻¹⁹ C)
μ₀ = Permeability of free space (4π × 10⁻⁷ Tm/A)
r = distance from particle (2.10 μm)
There is a cross product between the velocity vector and the radius vector (not a quantity, but specifies a direction). We can write this as:
Where 'θ' is the angle between the velocity and radius vectors.
a)
To find the angle between the velocity and radius vector, we find the complementary angle:
θ = 90° - 60° = 30°
Plugging 'θ' into the equation along with our other values:
b)
Repeat the same process. The angle between the velocity and radius vector is 150°, and its sine value is the same as that of sin(30°). So, the particle's produced field will be the same as that of part A.
c)
In this instance, the radius vector and the velocity vector are perpendicular so
'θ' = 90°.
d)
This point is ALONG the velocity vector, so there is no magnetic field produced at this point.
Aka, the radius and velocity vectors are parallel, and since sin(0) = 0, there is no magnetic field at this point.
Answer:
3.71 m/s
Explanation:
From the law of conservation of linear momentum, since we are neglecting minor energy losses due to friction then we can express it as since all the potential energy is transformed to kinetic energy
Making v the subject of the formula then and here m is the mass of the block, g is acceleration due to gravity, h is the height. Substituting 0.7 m for h and 9.81 for g then we obtain that
Answer:
E. downward and constant
Explanation:
Freefall is a special case of motion with constant acceleration because the acceleration due to gravity is always constant and downward. This is true even when an object is thrown upward or has zero velocity.
For example, when a ball is thrown up in the air, the ball's velocity is initially upward. Since gravity pulls the object toward the earth with a constant acceleration ggg, the magnitude of velocity decreases as the ball approaches maximum height. At the highest point in its trajectory, the ball has zero velocity, and the magnitude of velocity increases again as the ball falls back toward the earth.
