1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
pshichka [43]
4 years ago
13

Explain why stellar parallax cannot be used to measure the distance to other galaxies.

Physics
1 answer:
Phoenix [80]4 years ago
8 0

Answer:

1. a) Astronomers use the parallax method to measure the distance to nearby stars, but

we can’t use it to measure the distance to stars in other galaxies. Why not? Why isn’t the

parallax method useful for measuring the distances to stars in other galaxies?

They are so distant that the parallax is too small to be measured since parallax varies

inversely with distance.

b) Instead of the parallax method, we use the standard candle method to measure the

distance to stars in other galaxies. In particular, we use the standard candle method to

measure the distances to Cepheid variable stars in other galaxies. What is special about

Cepheid variable stars that makes them useful for this purpose?

We can figure out their luminosities from their periods of variation. Then if we measure

their fluxes we can calculate their distances.

2. a) From what were the protons and electrons in your body made, and roughly when

were they made?

They were made from energy (or gamma rays) very soon after the big bang (in the first

second). 400,000 years later they got together to make hydrogen atoms.

b) From what were the carbon atoms in your body made, and where were they made?

They were not made in the big bang. They were made much later inside of stars or in

supernovae. They were made by fusion from lighter atoms.

3. Make two sketches of the Milky Way Galaxy, one an edge-on view and one a face-on

view, labeling the various parts of the galaxy.

You should have labeled the

You might be interested in
Using the rules for significant figures, what do you get when you multiply 67.6 by 1.2?
Paul [167]

Answer:

B. 81

Explanation:

When you multiply two numbers, round the answer to the least number of significant figures available.  67.6 has three significant figures, and 1.2 has two significant figures.  So we round to two significant figures.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
MEASUREMENT
lubasha [3.4K]

Answer:

You would need to type the numbers in the question or you could have added a picture but you didn't so there is no way to answer this question. Have a nice day!

5 0
3 years ago
Which of the following statements about energy is false?
Artemon [7]

Answer:

c

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
a car tire is filled with air at pressure 325000 pa at 283 k. if the tire warms up to 302 k, what is the new pressure of the tir
WARRIOR [948]

Answer:

346819 Pa       or   ,347000 Pa in 3 significant figures

Explanation:

P1= 325000Pa , T1= 283K ,

P2=?  T1= 302 K

as here volume and mass both are constant so using ratio method for pressure temperature law we have P1/T1 = P2/T2

THIS WE CAN ALSO OBTAIN BY RATIO METHOD FOR GENERAL GAS LAW AS

P1V1/(m1T1 ) =  P2 V2/ (m2 T2)

IF V1 = V2 =V AND m1=m2=m then expression reduces to

P1/T1 = P2/T2

or P2 = (P1/T1)×T2

P2 = (325000/283) × 302

P2 = 1148.41×302

P2=346819

P2 = 347000 Pa in 3 significant figures

8 0
3 years ago
Which body is in equilibrium?
zloy xaker [14]

Which body is in equilibrium?

(1) a satellite orbiting Earth in a circular orbit .  No.  The forces on it are unbalanced.  There's only one force acting on it ... the force of gravity, pulling it toward the center of the Earth.  That's a centripetal force, and the satellite is experiencing centripetal acceleration.

(2) a ball falling freely toward the surface of Earth.  No.  The forces on it are unbalanced.  There's only one force acting on it ... the force of gravity, pulling it toward the center of the Earth.  The ball is accelerating toward the ground.  

<em> (3) a car moving with a constant speed along a  straight, level road.  YES.</em> We don't even need to analyze the forces, just look at the car.  It's moving in a straight line, and its speed is not changing.  The car's acceleration is zero !  That  right there tells us that the NET force ... the sum of all forces acting on the car ... is zero.  THAT's called 'equilibrium'.

(4) a projectile at the highest point in its trajectory.  No.  The forces on it are unbalanced.  There's only one force acting on it ... the force of gravity, pulling it toward the center of the Earth.  The projectile is accelerating toward the ground.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Quantum mechanics applies to A) subatomic, atomic, nanometer-size, and micrometer-size systems. B) nanometer, micrometer, and ki
    6·1 answer
  • In order that a train stop safely it'll always pass a signal showing yellow light
    14·2 answers
  • The energy band gap of GaAs is 1.4 eV. Calculate the optimum wavelength of light for
    9·1 answer
  • If the lift has a maximum power of 5000 W, how much time would it take the lift to
    13·1 answer
  • The electric field 14.0 cm from the surface of a copper ball of radius 2.0 cm is directed toward the ball's center and has magni
    10·1 answer
  • Post-exposure radiation levels are approximately Normally distributed. The levels (in Sv) of a random sample of three trauma vic
    8·1 answer
  • ***PLEASE HELP*** (you don’t have to answer all but at least 1 or 2 answers would help!!!)
    7·1 answer
  • A coil 4.20 cm radius, containing 500 turns, is placed in a uniform magnetic field that varies with time according to B=( 1.20×1
    11·2 answers
  • A burning candle provides :
    15·1 answer
  • Which is NOT an example of unbalanced forces acting on an object
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!