1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
andre [41]
3 years ago
15

imagine a bouncing ball that does not lose any energy as it bounces. could it ever bounce to a greater height than it was droppe

d from? explain your answer

Physics
2 answers:
iren [92.7K]3 years ago
8 0
Depends on if it was thrown or dropped
Allisa [31]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

No, due to conservation of energy, the bouncing ball would need to create energy in order to bounce higher.

Explanation:

The question says that the ball was dropped, so we suppose that it will start at an initial velocity of zero. (If the ball was tossed, then it's initial velocity would be greater than zero and it would bounce accordingly, but it would never bounce higher than it's maximum height)

Due to conservation of energy, the energy of the ball will remain the same throughout its trip. As the ball travels down to the ground, its potential energy decreases while its kinetic energy will increase, its sum will remain constant.  When the ball hits the ground, it will have its maximum kinetic energy, which is equal to its potential energy (the energy the ball started with). The energy is transmited to the ground and back to the ball (supposing the bounce is completely elastic and no energy was lost as heat or vibration).

So the ball starts its way back up. The height it can reach will depend on its potential energy, since energy remains constant (energy is not created nor destroyed), the ball can only get as high as it was originaly dropped from sine its mass and the acceleration of gravity remains constant.

Take a look at the uploaded diagram which represents the given situation.  

You might be interested in
The light intensity incident on a metallic surface with a work function of 1.88 eV produces photoelectrons with a maximum kineti
ivanzaharov [21]

Answer:

KE = KE (incidental) - KE of emitted photons

or KE = h * f - Wf

So   h * f = KE + Wf = 1.2 + 1.88 = 3.08    incident energy

If you double the frequency then h * f = 6.16

KE = 6.16 - 1.2 = 4.96 eV

7 0
3 years ago
A helium nucleus (charge = 2e, mass = 6.63 10-27 kg) traveling at 6.20 105 m/s enters an electric field, traveling from point ci
MA_775_DIABLO [31]

Answer:

v_B=3.78\times 10^5\ m/s

Explanation:

It is given that,

Charge on helium nucleus is 2e and its mass is 6.63\times 10^{-27}\ kg

Speed of nucleus at A is v_A=6.2\times 10^5\ m/s

Potential at point A, V_A=1.5\times 10^3\ V

Potential at point B, V_B=4\times 10^3\ V

We need to find the speed at point B on the circle. It is based on the concept of conservation of energy such that :

increase in kinetic energy = increase in potential×charge

\dfrac{1}{2}m(v_A^2-v_B^2)=(V_B-V_A)q\\\\\dfrac{1}{2}m(v_A^2-v_B^2)={(4\times 10^3-1.5\times 10^3)}\times 2\times 1.6\times 10^{-19}=8\times 10^{-16}\\\\v_A^2-v_B^2=\dfrac{2\times 8\times 10^{-16}}{6.63\times 10^{-27}}\\\\v_A^2-v_B^2=2.41\times 10^{11}\\\\v_B^2=(6.2\times 10^5)^2-2.41\times 10^{11}\\\\v_B=3.78\times 10^5\ m/s

So, the speed at point B is 3.78\times 10^5\ m/s.

7 0
3 years ago
Two observers in different inertial reference frames moving relative to each other at nearly the speed of light see the same two
lions [1.4K]

Answer:

The correct answer is d Both the observer's are correct

Explanation:

We know by postulates of relativity that laws of physics are same in different inertial frames.

Thus for each of the frames they make observations related to their frames and since the observations are true for their individual frames they both are correct. But when we compare the two frames we need to use transformation equations to compare both the results.

3 0
3 years ago
A computer disk drive is turned on starting from rest and has a constant angular acceleration. If it took 0.750 seconds for the
Irina-Kira [14]

Answer:

a) Θ = ω₀*t + ½αt² To complete first revolution 2π rads = 0*t + ½αt² and to complete the first and second combined 4π rads = 0*t + ½α(t+0.810s)² Divide second by first: 2 = (t + 0.810s)² / t² This is quadratic in t and has roots at t = -0.336 s ← ignore and t = 1.96 s ◄ b) Use either equation from above: 2π rads = 0*t + ½α(1.96s)² α = 3.27 rad/s² ◄ Hope this helps!

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
The main explanation for why heat pumps work is the ________ law of thermodynamics. Zeroth First Second
kondor19780726 [428]

Zeroth Law of thermodinamics

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • ____ are streamlike movements of water in the ocean.(what is blank)
    15·1 answer
  • Comparing helium atoms with nitrogen molecules at the same temperature, the helium atoms on average are moving _______ and have
    7·1 answer
  • Inertia ____.
    6·1 answer
  • 。and 。 are needed to describe a force
    15·1 answer
  • What power objective lens has the greatest Field of view
    9·1 answer
  • If a marathon runner averages 9.51 mi/hr, how long does it take him to run a 26.220-mile marathon. Express your answers in hours
    8·1 answer
  • What are Radio/Tv waves?
    5·1 answer
  • A positively charged object will attract an object that has
    13·1 answer
  • A plane flies at 400 north of East for 150 miles,then flies 200 miles at an angle of 150 west of North. What is the plane's fina
    5·1 answer
  • I am confused. Magnetic flux linkage and magnetic flux don't have the same definition, but they have same units. But there formu
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!