Suppose no stars more massive than about 2 solar masses had ever formed. Would life as we know it have been able to develop

Physics

1 answer:

exis [7]3 years ago

6 0

Answer:

No, life would not be to develop

Explanation:

Stars less massive than about 2 solar masses can only produce natural element up to carbon and oxygen, which are the basic elements for building life. However, other more massive elements are needed by life to thrive and function properly, more massive elements like phosphorus, iron necessary for oxygen circulation, calcium for a strong support system, and silicon are essential for for life to form and be sustained here on Earth.

You might be interested in

forces F1 (east) and F2 are simultaneously applied to a 3.0kg mass. when F2 is east, a=5.0m/s² east and when F2 is west a=1.0m/s

zhenek [66]

Answer:

345453-5676

its the right answer

5 0

3 years ago

Why are multiple images seen when two plane mirrors are placed at an angle

Whitepunk [10]

Answer: Can I get a picture???

8 0

3 years ago

What is the exact meaning of net force?

ZanzabumX [31]

In science and physics net force is the mean or overall of all the forces acting on an object.

4 0

3 years ago

Identify and explain which ball most likely had the greatest speed.

deff fn [24]

Y, bc the height of the bounce back is higher than x

4 0

3 years ago

The solar mass of the Sun is 1. The orbital period of Jupiter is 11. 9 Earth years. What is the distance between Jupiter and the

cestrela7 [59]

The distance between Jupiter and the sun is 5.2 AU.

According to Kepler's third law, the square of the period of revolution of planets is proportional to the cube of their mean distances from the sun. From this; T^2 = r^3.

Now, we are told that the orbital period (T) is 11. 9 Earth years. We have to make the distance the subject of the formula.

r =T^2/3

r = (11.9)^2/3

r = 5.2 AU

Learn more: brainly.com/question/15207516

6 0

2 years ago